2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.513256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerancing surface accuracy of aspheric lenses used for imaging purposes

Abstract: Tolerancing aspheres and preparing the corresponding drawing indications significantly differ from techniques used at spherical lenses due mainly to surface waviness, an error caused by most asphere fabrication technologies. Standard (ISO) regulations proved to be adequate for several kinds of aspheric lenses (e.g. laser focusing/collimation) made by the traditional diamond turning method, but sometimes are not general enough for recent fabrication techniques (such as CNC polishing of glass aspheres), and toda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the peripheral region, larger Δ Z is found in the range of −3.52 to 4.96 µm, but is still below the pixel dimension of 7.1 µm and the layer thickness of 5 µm. The experimentally measured manufacturing accuracy is comparable with conventional methods for fabricating aspheric lenses . Therefore, the ultrasmooth optical surface together with the subvoxel precision of surfaces make it possible for the rapid 3D printing of high‐quality optical lenses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the peripheral region, larger Δ Z is found in the range of −3.52 to 4.96 µm, but is still below the pixel dimension of 7.1 µm and the layer thickness of 5 µm. The experimentally measured manufacturing accuracy is comparable with conventional methods for fabricating aspheric lenses . Therefore, the ultrasmooth optical surface together with the subvoxel precision of surfaces make it possible for the rapid 3D printing of high‐quality optical lenses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The MAORY optics manufacturing tolerances are summarized in Table 4 (Patti et al 2018). Surface irregularities can be described as waviness with a given period and amplitude (Erdei et al 2004). In general, the surface diameter sets the upper limit on the period when half cycle of waviness is over the whole surface affecting the nominal WF.…”
Section: Effect Of Optics Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper identifies another important difference in tolerancing panoramic systems. It is known that localized slope errors have different impact if they are on surfaces close or far from the aperture stop [2][3]. For panoramic imagers, these localized errors on the front surface were found to be even more critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because of this, localized slope errors create wavefront tilt instead of contributing to wavefront RMS error as they do near the stop when the full surface is illuminated for each field of view. Also, these problems with localized slope errors become more complex on aspherical surfaces and new tolerancing indications have been proposed [3][4] for an optical system with a small field of view. In this paper, the influence of a small localized error is studied, but specifically on the spherical or aspherical front surfaces of panoramic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%