Pro‐inflammatory cytokines induced by glycosylphosphatidylinositols (GPIs) of Plasmodium falciparum contribute to malaria pathogenesis and hence, the naturally acquired anti‐GPI antibody thought to provide protection against severe malaria (SM) by neutralizing the stimulatory activity of GPIs. In previous studies, the anti‐GPI antibody levels increased with age in parallel with the development of acquired immunity, and high levels of anti‐GPI antibodies were associated with mild malaria (MM) cases. In the present study, the relationship between the levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and anti‐GPI IgG antibody responses, parasitemia, and the clinical outcomes were evaluated in SM and mild malaria (MM) patients. Sera from a total of 110 SM and 72 MM cases after excluding of ineligible patients were analyzed for the levels of anti‐GPI antibodies, IgG subclasses, and cytokine responses by ELISA. While the total anti‐GPI antibody levels were similar in overall SM and MM groups, they were significantly higher in surviving SM patients than in fatal SM cases. In the case of cytokines, the TNF‐α and IL‐6 levels were significantly higher in SM compared to MM, whereas the IL‐10 levels were similar in both groups. The data presented here demonstrate that high levels of the circulatory pro‐inflammatory, TNF‐α, and IL‐6, are indicators of malaria severity, whereas anti‐inflammatory cytokine IL‐10 level does not differentiate SM and MM cases. Further, among SM patients, relatively low levels of anti‐GPI antibodies are indicators of fatal outcomes compared to survivors, suggesting that anti‐GPI antibodies provide some level of protection against SM fatality.