2022
DOI: 10.1111/joor.13309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tongue and mouth imagery questionnaire (TMIQ) for assessing motor imagery vividness of the temporomandibular region: A reliability and validity case‐control study

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approval was obtained from the regional ethics committee (CPP Sud‐Ouest et Outre‐Mer III 2018‐A02195‐50). Print tongue measurement was performed immediately after inclusion in the “Assessing Motor Imagery Ability of Tongue and Mouth in Subjects With and With no TMD” TMIQ study, aiming to assess the motor imagery ability of tongue and mouth in subjects with and without TMD ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT04102306 ) (Alvarado et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Approval was obtained from the regional ethics committee (CPP Sud‐Ouest et Outre‐Mer III 2018‐A02195‐50). Print tongue measurement was performed immediately after inclusion in the “Assessing Motor Imagery Ability of Tongue and Mouth in Subjects With and With no TMD” TMIQ study, aiming to assess the motor imagery ability of tongue and mouth in subjects with and without TMD ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT04102306 ) (Alvarado et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size corresponded to another computation from the TMIQ study, for which a total of 94 participants was needed to be included (i.e., 47 participants per group) (Alvarado et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%