2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too close to call: Spatial distance between options influences choice difficulty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If physical separation and connection ground mental separation and connection, then basic cognitive tasks that hinge on mental separation should be facilitated (vs. undermined) when relevant entities are physically separated (vs. connected). For example, choosing one object from a set of objects involves mental separation, a task that is completed faster, more easily, and with greater confidence when the objects are physically far apart (vs. close together; Schneider, Stapels, Koole, and Schwarz, 2020). Similarly, assigning entities to different categories entails mental separation, a task that is completed faster when response keys corresponding to different categories are physically far apart (vs. close together; Lakens, Schneider, Jostmann, and Schubert, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If physical separation and connection ground mental separation and connection, then basic cognitive tasks that hinge on mental separation should be facilitated (vs. undermined) when relevant entities are physically separated (vs. connected). For example, choosing one object from a set of objects involves mental separation, a task that is completed faster, more easily, and with greater confidence when the objects are physically far apart (vs. close together; Schneider, Stapels, Koole, and Schwarz, 2020). Similarly, assigning entities to different categories entails mental separation, a task that is completed faster when response keys corresponding to different categories are physically far apart (vs. close together; Lakens, Schneider, Jostmann, and Schubert, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were presented with two completely different forms of vision (see Figure 3 ). We referred to previous empirical studies that recommended the rotation factor of 45° ( Ścigała and Indurkhya, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Li and Cao, 2017 ; Zhai et al, 2018 ; Schneider et al, 2020 ). For example, (ang zang, means dirty) corresponding to immorality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If physical separation and connection ground mental separation and connection, then basic cognitive tasks that hinge on mental separation should be facilitated (vs. undermined) when relevant entities are physically separated (vs. connected). For example, choosing one object from a set of objects involves mental separation, a task that is completed faster, more easily, and with greater confidence when the objects are physically far apart (vs. close together; Schneider, Stapels, Koole, and Schwarz, 2020). Similarly, assigning entities to different categories entails mental separation, a task that is completed faster when response keys corresponding to different categories are physically far apart (vs. close together; Lakens, Schneider, Jostmann, and Schubert, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%