2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool condition classification in turning process using hidden Markov model based on texture analysis of machined surface images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bhat et al . (2016) developed a hidden Markov model-based tool condition monitoring methodology ensuring the economical usages of cutting tools. Liao et al .…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bhat et al . (2016) developed a hidden Markov model-based tool condition monitoring methodology ensuring the economical usages of cutting tools. Liao et al .…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Simulated surface profile. (d) Return map of (c).Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design,Analysis and Manufacturing et al (2016) described the hidden Markov model-based methodology for recognizing the machining states ensuring safe operations Bhat et al (2016). developed a hidden Markov model-based tool condition monitoring methodology ensuring the economical usages of cutting tools Liao et al (2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haralick texture features, computed from the GLCM, are widely used due to their simplicity and intuitive interpretations, and have successfully been applied in e.g . in the analysis of skin texture [5], in land-use and forest-type classification [6], in automatic pollen detection [7], in fabric defect detection [8], in plant leaf classification [9], in cutting tool condition monitoring [10], and electrophoresis analysis [11]. In recent years there has been a rapid increase in the application of Haralick features in medical image analysis, e.g .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although condition monitoring has been extensively studied, some limitations persist concerning the performance of monitoring systems under realistic machining conditions [ 10 ]. Condition monitoring systems have been proposed using many different approaches, some with different success rates and limitations, such as neural networks [ 3 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], fuzzy logic [ 15 , 16 ], Markov chains [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], expert systems [ 20 ] and many others [ 10 ]. Neural networks present some of the most attractive features, such as the capability of abstraction of hardly accessible knowledge and generalization from distorted sensor signals when applied to sensor fusion and classification in tool wear monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%