1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2361(1999)18:4<313::aid-zoo5>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tooth loss rate from two captive sandtiger sharks (Carcharias taurus)

Abstract: For 6 months, two sandtiger sharks (Carcharias taurus) were held captive together in a small enclosure at the Lisbon Zoo. During that period, the gravel was monitored daily for teeth shed by the animals. At the end of their stay, the number of teeth divided by the number of days yielded a tooth loss rate of 1.06 teeth per day per shark. The plotting of mean monthly values for tooth loss rate against mean monthly temperatures showed that these two variables increased with time, suggesting that the animals' meta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher number of teeth per tooth file might be linked with a faster tooth replacement (Moyer et al, 2015 ). However, tooth replacement rates are impacted by various factors, including tooth imbrication patterns or water temperature (Correia, 1999 ; Luer et al, 1990 ; Strasburg, 1963 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher number of teeth per tooth file might be linked with a faster tooth replacement (Moyer et al, 2015 ). However, tooth replacement rates are impacted by various factors, including tooth imbrication patterns or water temperature (Correia, 1999 ; Luer et al, 1990 ; Strasburg, 1963 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As individuals grow and disperse over time, they drop teeth at a constant rate [ 29 ], such that the accumulation of differently sized dentition mirrors the size-distribution of sharks visiting each site. While tooth shedding rates can vary seasonally [ 30 , 31 ], the inclusion of this dynamic has very little effect on model results (electronic supplementary material, appendix III).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%