2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tooth transplantations: a descriptive retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
1
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
90
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Pogrel et al (1987) found a success rate of 62% for the transplantation of maxillary canines after a follow-up of at least 2 years [43]. In the study of Kallu et al (2005) the success rate for canines was 51% with a mean follow-up time of 3.8 years [8]. These rates are comparable with the success rate which is found in the present study, but our results indicate the success rate 11 years after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pogrel et al (1987) found a success rate of 62% for the transplantation of maxillary canines after a follow-up of at least 2 years [43]. In the study of Kallu et al (2005) the success rate for canines was 51% with a mean follow-up time of 3.8 years [8]. These rates are comparable with the success rate which is found in the present study, but our results indicate the success rate 11 years after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Transplantation of teeth at the stage between ½ -¾ of its final root length shows the best prognosis ( Figure 2). If a nonfunctioning tooth, such as an impacted tooth, is chosen as a donor tooth, the success rate decreases because the PDL may be inadequate to develop a functioning attachment in its new position [3,[6][7][8][9]. transplantation [7].…”
Section: Donor Tooth Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A follow-up study of 194 patients by Kallu et al 29 reported a lower success rate for canines and molars than for premolars: it was suggested that poorer accessibility increased the risk of damage to canines and molars. The reported overall success rate was 68%, but the success rate for premolars was 87%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] When treated with adequate indications, autotransplantation offers a fast and economically viable option for replacing missing teeth 2,[5][6][7] Root resorption, the most common complication accompanying autotransplantation, leads to poor esthetics, the tilting of adjacent teeth, loss of function, and permanent tooth loss. [8][9][10] Occurrence of replacement resorption is influenced by factors such as the extra-alveolar period 11 , preservative solution 12 , pulpal revascularization 13 , and microbial contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%