1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1997)5:6<199::aid-evan2>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tooth use and the physical properties of food

Abstract: For decades, natural historians and comparative anatomists have acknowledged the form/function relationship between an animal's dentition and its food. Historically, anthropologists have cited this relationship to explain adaptations observed in modern species as well as to infer the diets of extinct animals found in the fossil record. Anthropologists have described morphological differences between species that permit dietary niche partitioning which allows closely related primates to co‐exist within a single… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations in tooth shape are a means of adapting to changes in the internal characteristics of foods, such as their strength, toughness, and deformability (39)(40)(41)(42)(43). Clearly, foods are complicated structures; thus it is impossible to describe all of the internal characteristics that might have confronted the earliest hominids' teeth.…”
Section: Tooth Shapementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Variations in tooth shape are a means of adapting to changes in the internal characteristics of foods, such as their strength, toughness, and deformability (39)(40)(41)(42)(43). Clearly, foods are complicated structures; thus it is impossible to describe all of the internal characteristics that might have confronted the earliest hominids' teeth.…”
Section: Tooth Shapementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Angularity is a measure of jaggedness or change in slope across a surface rather than steepness per se. This finding is consistent with the expectation that a more folivorous form should have more angular surfaces for shearing and slicing tough leaves than a frugivore that needs a flatter, less angular surface for crushing and grinding fruits (20,21). The lack of interaction between wear stage and taxon suggests that differences in angularity are maintained between species throughout the wear sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive understanding of the feeding biomechanics and dental functional anatomy of living anthropoids is required to accurately reconstruct the diets of fossil primates. Although considerable attention has been devoted to the functional morphology of living and fossil anthropoid molars and premolars (Groves and Napier, 1968;Kay, 1978;Lucas, 1980Lucas, , 1982Wood et al, 1983;Benyon, 1986;Ungar and Kay, 1995;Kay and Ungar, 1997;Benyon et al, 1998;Strait, 1998;Ungar, 1998;Smith, 1999;Ungar and Kiera, 2003;Teaford, 2007;Skinner et al, 2008;Kupczik et al, 2009) comparatively little is known about the functional morphology of anthropoid incisors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Therefore, the correlation between pronounced incisal curvature and frugivorous diets among anthropoids is consistent with the hypothesis that MD and CI crown curvature function to resist the elevated occlusal loading and bending stresses associated with frugivory (Lucas and Teaford, 1994;Ungar, 1995;Strait, 1998;Elgart-Berry, 2004;Lucas, 2004;Wright, 2005;Norconk et al, 2009). Alternatively, increased incisor crown curvature may (i) function to resist dental wear by increasing the relative incisor crown surface area, (ii) increase dietary efficiency by optimizing incisor orientation and occlusion, (iii).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%