2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top Down proteomics: Facts and perspectives

Abstract: The rise of the “Top Down” method in the field of mass spectrometry-based proteomics has ushered in a new age of promise and challenge for the characterization and identification of proteins. Injecting intact proteins into the mass spectrometer allows for better characterization of post-translational modifications and avoids several of the serious “inference” problems associated with peptide-based proteomics. However, successful implementation of a Top Down approach to endogenous or other biologically relevant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
386
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(391 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(184 reference statements)
3
386
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when intact protein molecular ions are introduced in the MS, the strategy is called topdown (Tran et al, 2011;Catherman et al, 2014). In this case, the use of an ESI source requires coupling with a highly accurate mass analyzer for unique identification, to locate and characterize posttranslational modifications.…”
Section: Protein/peptide Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, when intact protein molecular ions are introduced in the MS, the strategy is called topdown (Tran et al, 2011;Catherman et al, 2014). In this case, the use of an ESI source requires coupling with a highly accurate mass analyzer for unique identification, to locate and characterize posttranslational modifications.…”
Section: Protein/peptide Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Btopdown proteomics^analysis characterizes entire proteins. This approach allows, among others, the study of posttranslational modification (PTM) crosstalk (Catherman et al 2014). However, because of the unique characteristics of each protein, top-down proteomics is technically rather challenging and experimental conditions have to be adopted for each protein-of-interest or each protein group-of-interest.…”
Section: Quantitative Ms-based Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nice review has been presented with details of different methodological approaches used so far to quantify all proteoforms present in any given snake venom [131,132]. The recent advancements in mass spectrometric instrumentation, dissociation strategies, and bioinformatic tools including top-down mass spectrometry instrumentation is increasingly attaining momentum in proteomic analysis [133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142]. More recently, Daniel P. et al was the first person who applied top-down mass spectrometry for the snake (Indonesian King Cobra, Ophiophagus Hannah) Venomic proteomics applications [143].…”
Section: Tdp In Snake Venomic Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%