2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/bibm47256.2019.8983340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TOP: Towards Better Toxicity Prediction by Deep Molecular Representation Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that chemical information is able to canonicalize SMILES strings, Peng et al [88] exploit a framework called TOP, combining the usage of SMILES and predefined properties, including root atom positions and isomeric features. A bidirectional gated recurrent unit-based RNN (BiGRU) is employed for the SMILES strings to capture local and global context information.…”
Section: Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that chemical information is able to canonicalize SMILES strings, Peng et al [88] exploit a framework called TOP, combining the usage of SMILES and predefined properties, including root atom positions and isomeric features. A bidirectional gated recurrent unit-based RNN (BiGRU) is employed for the SMILES strings to capture local and global context information.…”
Section: Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discovered in the molecule generation task, the overall performances on the MoleculeNet dataset reveal the overwhelming advantages of graph models over the string ones, especially for those involving multilevel structural details [109]. The superb performance of TOP [88] on the ClinTox dataset demonstrates the strengths of incorporating multiple kinds of fingerprints compared to SMILES2vec [86]. The speciallydesigned mixed representation with SMILES strings and physiochemical properties demonstrate its superior capability for toxicity prediction on the ClinTox dataset.…”
Section: Benchmark Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a benchmark toxicity prediction database that comprises 12 different cellular assays values of 8458 compounds corresponding to 12 different targets [19]. Twelves different cellular assays correspond to 12 classification tasks, although there are some missing values in each cellular assay [10], [19].…”
Section: A Benchmark Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since QSPR can exploit the intrinsic relationships between molecular structure and the physicochemical and biochemical properties of molecules, QSPR models have been widely developed and applied to the ADMET properties prediction to provide faster, cost-effective and accurate prediction of unknown compounds ADMET properties [8], [9]. QSPR has become the most efficient and popular molecular properties prediction method due to its automatic, efficient, highthroughput, large-scale characteristics [10]. In QSPR models, multiple linear regression, neural network, random forest (RF), support vector machine, and fully connected-based deep neural network (FDNN, or DNN for short in some literature) are typically used to map the structure of compounds represented by hand-crafted features (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74,[80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) are two common architectures for discovering low-dimensional descriptors. CNNs employ convolutional layers to extract a low-dimensional set of spatial features present in a structured data set, like a pixel-or voxel-based digitized image shown in Figure3b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%