2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2020.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topic-based crossing-workflow fragment discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the modules' alignment is determined based on the relationship between the predicted value and the predefined threshold. Attribute similarity‐based approach (ASA) 24 : As the most commonly used method for module alignment problems, it calculates the attribute similarity of module pairs based on fundamental attributes to match modules. In our experiment, we adopt the same computation approach introduced in Section 4.2 for a reasonable comparison. Topic model‐based approach (TMA) 36 : This approach quantifies the semantic relevance of modules by their representative topics, which are generated by biterm topic model 37 using the name and description of modules. WordNet‐based approach (WNA) 21 : This method employs WordNet , 38 a lexical database of the English language, to enhance the semantic meanings of words and compute the similarity between them. Specifically, WordNet is used to calculate the similarity of the modules' names, while the xsimilarity algorithm 39 is utilized to compute the similarity of their descriptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the modules' alignment is determined based on the relationship between the predicted value and the predefined threshold. Attribute similarity‐based approach (ASA) 24 : As the most commonly used method for module alignment problems, it calculates the attribute similarity of module pairs based on fundamental attributes to match modules. In our experiment, we adopt the same computation approach introduced in Section 4.2 for a reasonable comparison. Topic model‐based approach (TMA) 36 : This approach quantifies the semantic relevance of modules by their representative topics, which are generated by biterm topic model 37 using the name and description of modules. WordNet‐based approach (WNA) 21 : This method employs WordNet , 38 a lexical database of the English language, to enhance the semantic meanings of words and compute the similarity between them. Specifically, WordNet is used to calculate the similarity of the modules' names, while the xsimilarity algorithm 39 is utilized to compute the similarity of their descriptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some researchers have begun to extract implicit semantic information for alignment 21 . Interoperability of services can be mined from related ontology descriptions, 22,23 but this approach relies on the existence of well‐curated ontologies and authors using these ontologies to tag their modules 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ontology-based behavioural similarity analyses and excerpts information of operating models to gather characteristics enclosed by event logs. Zhou and others [14] Semantic WordNet To encourage the restate or remodel of estate experimental procedures, this research developed a new crossing-workflow fragment discovery technique. BTM generates representative topics that measure the semantic applicability of events and procedure sections.…”
Section: Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of workflow fragments is closely related to service discovery, which exploits: Web Service Decription Language-based keyword search, semantic matching based on domain knowledge or ontologies, context awareness, or Quality of Service (QoS)-based discovery, and machine learning techniques adopted to examine service relevance. ZhangBing Zhou et al proposed in paper [2] "a novel crossing workflow fragment discovery mechanism, where an activity knowledge graph is constructed to capture flat invocation relations between activities, and hierarchical parent-child relations specified upon sub-workflows and their corresponding activities". Semantic relevance of activities and sub-workflows is calculated based on their representative topics.…”
Section: Topic-based Crossing-workflow Fragment Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%