2012
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical corticosteroids applied with a squirt system are more effective than a nasal spray for steroid‐dependent olfactory impairment

Abstract: The application of topical corticosteroids with a squirt system was more effective than with a spray in maintaining olfactory improvement with oral corticosteroid treatment. Nevertheless, it only partially maintained the improvement so that topical corticosteroid treatment using a squirt system needs to be combined with intervals of short-term oral corticosteroids to treat steroid-dependent olfactory loss while avoiding the side effects of long-term oral corticosteroid use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in accordance with previous studies on nasal spray, which show a poor delivery onto the olfactory epithelium and no effect on olfactory dysfunction in many patients with olfactory loss and sinonasal disease . Oral administration of prednisolone (the most commonly used steroid without specific dose regimen) improved olfactory function, as shown in previous studies . With regard to sonic nebulization, our results are in accordance with studies on the effect of topical corticosteroids application through pressure‐pulsed inhalation or transnasal nebulization as a treatment option for CRS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are in accordance with previous studies on nasal spray, which show a poor delivery onto the olfactory epithelium and no effect on olfactory dysfunction in many patients with olfactory loss and sinonasal disease . Oral administration of prednisolone (the most commonly used steroid without specific dose regimen) improved olfactory function, as shown in previous studies . With regard to sonic nebulization, our results are in accordance with studies on the effect of topical corticosteroids application through pressure‐pulsed inhalation or transnasal nebulization as a treatment option for CRS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If direct OC mucosal inflammation is driving olfactory loss, then the efficacy of these medications will vary in part based on their ability to adequately reach the OC mucosa. Devices or techniques that can deliver anti‐inflammatory medications effectively into the olfactory cleft could offer therapeutic advantage from an olfactory standpoint …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices or techniques that can deliver anti-inflammatory medications effectively into the olfactory cleft could offer therapeutic advantage from an olfactory standpoint. 6,[24][25][26][27][28] Anti-inflammatory medications delivered systemically would theoretically reach the inflamed OC mucosa directly via the bloodstream. The ability of systemic corticosteroids to improve olfaction in CRSwNP has been known for decades and is recommended as a treatment option in evidence-based reviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corticosteroids are the most frequently prescribed drugs used to treat olfactory dysfunction [3]. An intranasal corticosteroid application produces fewer side effects than do oral corticosteroids [4]. However, a conventional intranasal corticosteroid application has been considered as having little effect on olfactory dysfunction due to the inability of topical corticosteroids to reach the OC [3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, several modified modalities of delivery have been recommended in order to help improve the access of topical corticosteroids to the OC [3][4][5]. When the OC is obstructed by a local inflammation of mucosa with a stagnation of secretion, the olfactory function is often nonresponsive to medical treatment [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%