In the papers [I. Singer, Lin. Alg. Appl. 2010] and [I. Singer and V. Nitica, Lin. Alg. Appl. 2012] we have studied functions defined on a b-complete idempotent semimodule X over a b-complete idempotent semifield K = (K, ⊕, ⊗), with values in K, where K may (or may not) contain a greatest element sup K, and the residuation x/y is not defined for x ∈ X and y = inf X. In the present paper we assume that K has no greatest element, then adjoin to K an outside "greatest element" ⊤ = sup K and extend the operations ⊕ and ⊗ from K to K := K∪ {⊤}, so as to obtain a meaning also for x/ inf X, for any x ∈ X, and study functions with values in K. In fact we consider two different extensions of the product ⊗ from K to K, denoted by ⊗ and⊗ respectively, and use them to give characterizations of topical (i.e. increasing homogeneous, defined with the aid of ⊗) and anti-topical (i.e. decreasing anti-homogeneous, defined with the aid of⊗) functions in terms of some inequalities. Next we introduce and study for functions f : X → K their conjugates and biconjugates of Fenchel-Moreau type with respect to the coupling functions ϕ(x, y) = x/y, ∀x, y ∈ X, and ψ(x, (y, d)) := inf{x/y, d}, ∀x, y ∈ X, ∀d ∈ K, and use them to obtain characterizations of topical and anti-topical functions. In the subsequent sections we consider for the coupling functions ϕ and ψ some concepts that have been studied in I. Singer, Optimization, 2001] and [I. Singer, Optimization, 2004] for the so-called "additive min-type coupling functions" πµ : R n max × R n max → Rmax and πµ : A n ×A n → A respectively, where A is a conditionally complete lattice ordered group and πµ(x, y) := inf 1≤i≤n (xi + yi), ∀x, y ∈ R n max (or A n ). Thus, we study the polars of a set G ⊆ X for the coupling functions ϕ and ψ, and we consider for a function f : X → K the notion of support set of f with respect to the set T of all "elementary topical functions" ty(x) := x/y, ∀x ∈ X, ∀y ∈ X\{inf X} and two concepts of support set of f at a point x0 ∈ X. The main differences between the properties of the conjugations with respect to the coupling functions ϕ, ψ and πµ and between the properties of the polars of a set G with respect to the coupling functions ϕ, ψ and πµ are caused by the fact that while πµ is symmetric, with values only in Rmax (resp. A), ϕ and ψ are not symmetric and take values also outside Rmax (resp. A). (29) and (30) are equivalent if λ, µ, β ∈ K \ {ε} (indeed, this follows immediately from the fact that αα −1 = e for any α ∈ K \ {ε}). Thus it remains to consider the cases when one of λ, µ or β is ε or ⊤.
Proof. A) The inequalitiesCase (I): λ = ε. Then (29) means that ε = εµ ≤ β, which is true for all µ, β, and (30) means that β −1 µ ≤ λ −1 = ⊤, which is also true for all µ, β. Hence (29) ⇔ (30).Case (IIa): λ = ⊤ and µ = ε. Then (29) means that ε = ⊤ε ≤ β, which is true for all β, and (30) means that ε = β −1 µ ≤ λ −1 , which is also true for all β. Hence (29) ⇔ (30).Case (IIb): λ = ⊤ and µ = ε. Then (29) means that ⊤ = ⊤µ ≤ β, which implies that β = ⊤, whence β −1...