1989
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90125-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographic brain measures of human pain and pain responsivity

Abstract: Individual differences in human pain responsivity were characterized by the 1 degree C cold-pressor test. Behaviorally, a pain-tolerant group (PT = 29 Ss) tolerated the entire 3-min test (means = 180 +/- 0 sec), while a pain-sensitive group (PS = 13 Ss) averaged only 50.31 +/- 20.81 sec of the cold-pressor test (t = 16.75, P less than 0.0001), replicating our earlier studies. Physiologically, the PT group exhibited no mean differences from the PS group in cortical power densities at the baseline stage. Under t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
61
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 and 15), cold pressor tolerance (e.g., ref. 16), and pain associated with manual palpation of tender points in fibromyalgia sufferers (17). In the cold pressor test, Chen et al (16,18) consistently observe dichotomous responses, with a minority ''painsensitive'' group tolerating the test for a mean duration of 50 sec and a majority ''pain-tolerant'' group able to tolerate the test for the full 300-sec duration.…”
Section: The Scope Of Individual Variability To Pain and Analgesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 and 15), cold pressor tolerance (e.g., ref. 16), and pain associated with manual palpation of tender points in fibromyalgia sufferers (17). In the cold pressor test, Chen et al (16,18) consistently observe dichotomous responses, with a minority ''painsensitive'' group tolerating the test for a mean duration of 50 sec and a majority ''pain-tolerant'' group able to tolerate the test for the full 300-sec duration.…”
Section: The Scope Of Individual Variability To Pain and Analgesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brain mechanism and EEG pattern during pain generally is due to sensory processing and to all effective and cognitive processes linked to sensory processing [5], [8]. It seems that the lack of clear and consistent answer to this question is related to the methods used for analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 -9 Moreover, changes in electroencephalographic (EEG) spectra in humans have been shown to reflect changes in cerebral activity associated with the cognitive perception of pain. 10,11 Hence, EEG responses to noxious stimulation may be useful in determining the time at which the neurological apparatus required for conscious perception of sensations, including pain, becomes functional.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This minimal anaesthesia model is based on observations that EEG responses to noxious stimulation in conscious and anaesthetized animals are similar to those of conscious humans exposed to painful stimuli. 11,32,33 The model has the advantage of being humane as it avoids any conscious perception of pain, and it also minimizes EEG artefacts by markedly reducing spontaneous muscular activity. Although the minimal anaesthesia model does not demonstrate that animals are capable of conscious perception, it does allow inferences to be drawn regarding whether or not the cerebral cortex is capable of responding to systemic stimulation at the different ages investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%