2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographic gravimetric effects in earth sciences: Review of origin, significance and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deviations from the theoretical free‐air gradient impose additional uncertainties that are not easily quantified. The local free‐air gradient depends significantly on the source of deformation and may be different for, for example, post‐glacial rebound (Olsson et al., 2015) compared to volcano deformation involving subsurface fluid redistribution, where the free‐air gradient or Bouguer corrected free‐air gradient (Vajda et al., 2020, 2021) may be more suitable. Free‐body geometry inversions (Camacho et al., 2021) or coupled inversions of surface deformation and gravity (Nikkhoo & Rivalta, 2021) may provide an alternative to recover source parameters; however, mass accumulation without commensurate surface deformation that involves non‐elastic behavior, for example, density changes through degassing or the compressibility of gas‐rich magma (Rivalta & Segall, 2008), makes joint inversions of gravity and deformation nontrivial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations from the theoretical free‐air gradient impose additional uncertainties that are not easily quantified. The local free‐air gradient depends significantly on the source of deformation and may be different for, for example, post‐glacial rebound (Olsson et al., 2015) compared to volcano deformation involving subsurface fluid redistribution, where the free‐air gradient or Bouguer corrected free‐air gradient (Vajda et al., 2020, 2021) may be more suitable. Free‐body geometry inversions (Camacho et al., 2021) or coupled inversions of surface deformation and gravity (Nikkhoo & Rivalta, 2021) may provide an alternative to recover source parameters; however, mass accumulation without commensurate surface deformation that involves non‐elastic behavior, for example, density changes through degassing or the compressibility of gas‐rich magma (Rivalta & Segall, 2008), makes joint inversions of gravity and deformation nontrivial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Growth inversion approach was originally developed (Camacho et al 1997) for inverting complete Bouguer gravity anomalies (CBA) given on the topographic surface. The topographically corrected (Bouguer) gravity anomalies/disturbances represent the gravitational effect of subsurface anomalous density distribution (Vajda et al 2006(Vajda et al , 2020. The inversion approach underwent several improvements and refinements over time leading to the GROWTH-2 and GROWTH-3 versions (Camacho et al 2000(Camacho et al , 2002(Camacho et al , 2011b(Camacho et al , 2021a and was applied in structural studies in several regions (e.g., ).…”
Section: Methods Applied To Interpret the Tenerife 2004-2005 Gravity ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If surface deformation (uplift or subsidence) accompanies the observed gravity changes, they must be properly corrected for the gravitational effect of the surface deformation. This correction is given in terms of the deformation-induced topographic effect 50 , 51 and is to be evaluated by Newtonian volumetric integration. The gravity changes are affected also by the gravitational effect of inner (subsurface) deformations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%