1992
DOI: 10.1159/000118923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographical Analysis of Sleep Spindle Activity

Abstract: There is evidence for two types of sleep spindle activity, one with a frequency of about 12 cycles/s (cps) and the other of about 14 cps. Visual examination indicates that both spindle types occur independently, whereby the 12-cps spindles are more pronounced in the frontal and the 14-cps spindles in the parietal region. The purpose of this paper is to provide more information about the exact topography of these patterns. First the occurrence of distinct signals in anterior and posterior brain regions was veri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
71
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to our main results, our data show that the average power level of the SPTCs differ between topographical sites, being highest in the frontal and lowest in the posterior regions. A lthough not a primar y concern here, this is in line with a number of studies that have focused on the issue of regional differences in average spectral power (Jobert et al, 1992;Kattler et al, 1994;Werth et al, 1996;Cajochen et al, 1999;Vyazovskiy et al, 2000;Achermann et al, 2001;Anderer et al, 2001;Finelli et al, 2001;Ferrara et al, 2002b;Knoblauch et al, 2002). The question that arises is: what is (are) the brain structure(s) that could give rise to these two distinct types of obser vation, one on similarity of shape and timing of power time-courses and the other on differences in the average power of the time-courses?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition to our main results, our data show that the average power level of the SPTCs differ between topographical sites, being highest in the frontal and lowest in the posterior regions. A lthough not a primar y concern here, this is in line with a number of studies that have focused on the issue of regional differences in average spectral power (Jobert et al, 1992;Kattler et al, 1994;Werth et al, 1996;Cajochen et al, 1999;Vyazovskiy et al, 2000;Achermann et al, 2001;Anderer et al, 2001;Finelli et al, 2001;Ferrara et al, 2002b;Knoblauch et al, 2002). The question that arises is: what is (are) the brain structure(s) that could give rise to these two distinct types of obser vation, one on similarity of shape and timing of power time-courses and the other on differences in the average power of the time-courses?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Here, we confirmed that spindles less than 0.2 sec were not included in the analyses. Spindles were categorized so that they were orthogonal at the scalp locations where they predominate topographically Werth, Achermann, Dijk, & Borbely, 1997;Zeitlhofer et al, 1997;Jobert, Poiseau, Jahnig, Schulz, & Kubicki, 1992) as slow spindles (11-13.5 Hz) at Fz and fast spindles (13.5-16 Hz) at Pz (Table 1).…”
Section: Psg Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings from leads placed centrally reflect EEG activity summed from both frontal and parietal regions and are considered the most sensitive for recording sleep related activity. [28][29][30][31] Sleep power spectral analysis was performed on all NREM and REM stages. Each 30-sec epoch was visually screened for artifacts (EMG, temporary disconnect spikes, sweating, body movements), and epochs with artifacts were removed from further analysis.…”
Section: Power Spectral Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%