1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80150-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo

Abstract: Topographic maps, which maintain the spatial order of neurons in the order of their axonal connections, are found throughout the nervous system. In the visual retinotectal projection, ELF-1, a ligand in the tectum, and its receptors in the retina show complementary gradients in expression and binding, indicating they may be positional labels for map development. Here we show that ELF-1 acts as a repellent axon guidance factor in vitro. In vivo, when the tectal ELF-1 pattern is modified by retroviral overexpres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
322
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 413 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
14
322
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During development of the retinotectal map of the chick, which projects an image of the visual world from the retina to the tectum of the midbrain, two ligands, ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5, are expressed in an anteroposterior gradient in the target Drescher et al, 1995), while their receptor EphA3 is expressed in the projecting retinal neurons, in a gradient along the matching nasotemporal axis . Assays of retinal axon responses have shown appropriate guidance e ects: ephrin-A5 can repel retinal axons in vitro (Drescher et al, 1995) with a topographically appropriate preference for temporal axons (Monschau et al, 1997), while ephrin-A2 can repel retinal axons in vitro and in vivo, also with a topographically appropriate specificity (Nakamoto et al, 1996). Ephrin-A2, ephrin-A5 and their receptor EphA3 thus have properties consistent with complementary positional axonal mapping labels of the type originally proposed by Sperry (1963).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During development of the retinotectal map of the chick, which projects an image of the visual world from the retina to the tectum of the midbrain, two ligands, ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5, are expressed in an anteroposterior gradient in the target Drescher et al, 1995), while their receptor EphA3 is expressed in the projecting retinal neurons, in a gradient along the matching nasotemporal axis . Assays of retinal axon responses have shown appropriate guidance e ects: ephrin-A5 can repel retinal axons in vitro (Drescher et al, 1995) with a topographically appropriate preference for temporal axons (Monschau et al, 1997), while ephrin-A2 can repel retinal axons in vitro and in vivo, also with a topographically appropriate specificity (Nakamoto et al, 1996). Ephrin-A2, ephrin-A5 and their receptor EphA3 thus have properties consistent with complementary positional axonal mapping labels of the type originally proposed by Sperry (1963).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In principle, the roof plate expression of ephrin-B3 could similarly act to inhibit axons from crossing to the contralateral side of the neural tube. The idea of a repellent activity for ephrin-B3 is particularly appealing in view of the axon repellent e ects shown for several other Eph family ligands: ephrin-A2, ephrin-A5, ephrin-B1 and ephrin-B2 (Drescher et al, 1995;Nakamoto et al, 1996;Wang and Anderson, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roles for Eph receptors and their ligands in cell-cell repulsion have been well established (Drescher et al, 1995;Nakamoto et al, 1996;Monschau et al, 1997;Frisen et al, 1998). To investigate whether the EphA8 signaling a ects cell adhesion, the same cell lines used for demonstrating Fyn association in vivo were tested for their properties to attach to culture dishes.…”
Section: Activation Of the Epha8 Receptor Attenuates Cell Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repulsive modes of interaction between Eph receptors and their ligands have been proposed to set up topographic projections in the retinotectal or retinocollicular systems (Cheng et al, 1995;Drescher et al, 1995;Nakamoto et al, 1996;Monschau et al, 1997;Frisen et al, 1998), the hippocampal and thalamic neurons (Gao et al, 1996(Gao et al, , 1998, and the guidance of migrating neural crest cells and motor axons to the rostral halves of developing somites (Krull et al, 1997;Wang and Anderson, 1997). Abnormalities in the formation of brain commissures have been observed in mice lacking EphB2, EphB3 and EphA8 receptors Orioli et al, 1996;Park et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations indicate that the nasal-retina versus temporal-retina distinction (as opposed to the left-eye versus righteye distinction) is the key parameter for patterning of eye-specific projections in the LGN. Numerous experiments carried out in lower vertebrates and mice indicate that ephrin-As mediate retinotopic mapping of the nasal-temporal axis in the SC and LGN [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] . We wanted to test whether ephrin-As have a second function in retino-geniculate mapping: dictating the stereotyped patterning of the eye-specific LGN layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%