Topologi og syntaks. En revision af Paul Diderichsens sætningsskema

Heltoft, Lars

doi:10.7146/nys.v16i16-17.13345

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The grammatical literature would suggest that the expletive subject is the textually unmarked F here (e.g. Heltoft 1986), but in this case topical det is in F. This indicates thatat least in the case of detinformation structure is weighted higher than grammatical role when it comes to choosing a clause opener. Theories on information structure have long assumed that a clause tends to take the preceding clause's message (rheme, assertion, focus, etc.)…”

Section: Flexible Referential Scopementioning

confidence: 87%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction:Det‘it, that’ andså‘then’ in the prefield in Danish

Puggaard

2019

Nord J Linguist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Through in-depth analysis of the use of det ‘it, that’ and så ‘then’ occupying the first clausal position (the prefield) in Danish talk-in-interaction, this paper investigates how speakers use highly flexible linguistic elements to their advantage when commencing clauses in real time. These particular words are useful when occupying the prefield, because their flexible nature means that they can be used even when speakers do not have a full format ready for the carrier clause, as long as they have some idea of the interactional purpose of the clause and its information structural prerequisites. The dominating frequency of the most frequent clause openers goes largely unmentioned in previous accounts of the prefield, and the use of det ‘it, that’ and så ‘then’ challenges the popular notion that the textually unmarked prefield is also the grammatical subject of the carrier clause.

show abstract

Section: Flexible Referential Scopementioning

confidence: 87%

“…Mikkelsen 1911:573ff. ;Diderichsen 1962:171;Nielsen 1975;Heltoft 1986;Hansen & Heltoft 2011:74;but compare Brøndal 1928 andHansen 1933 for opposing points of view). With regard to the communicative function of F, Diderichsen (1962:192ff.…”

Section: Previous Descriptions Of the Prefieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction:Det‘it, that’ andså‘then’ in the prefield in Danish

Puggaard

2019

Nord J Linguist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Forskning, laerebøger og undervisning i dansk grammatik har laenge vaeret optaget af hvordan topologien i helsaetninger og ledsaetninger kan beskrives stadig mere praecist (Diderichsen 1946;Hansen 1970;Heltoft 1986Heltoft , 1990Hansen 2007;Hansen & Heltoft 2011;Jensen & Christensen 2013). Kombinationen af helsaetning og ledsaetning er der til gengaeld gjort relativt lidt ud af topologisk -isaer kontekster hvor ledsaetningen optraeder til sidst.…”

Section: Indledningunclassified

Den yderste højrefløj – tunge ledsætninger og andre utilpassede elementer i sætningsperiferien

Mortensen¹

2016

nfg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the constituent order of the right periphery of Danish sentences in modern spoken and written discourse. While it is commonly held that final nominal clauses, due to weight, are positioned ‘outside’ the sentence, very few studies have discussed exactly where this outside position is located in relation to other right peripheral constituents. By discussing traditional accounts and criteria, it is shown that the position in question may be said to harbour not only nominal clauses and so-called ‘heavy constituents’ but a range of subclause types not previously associated with this position. Finally, the topology of extraposition (right-dislocation) and interjectionals are examined and incorporated in a suggested addition to the Danish sentence scheme’s right periphery.

show abstract

“…Diderichsens feltanalyse fikk snart en sterk stilling i dansk morsmålsgrammatikk og etter hvert, som en følge av den skandinaviske resepsjon av EDG, også stor innflytelse på beskrivelse og formidling av norsk og svensk grammatikk. Den ble gjenstand for en omfattende diskusjon og, i sin tur, revisjonsforslag (Heltoft 1986, som er en av kildene til den foreliggende fremstilling).…”

Section: Innledende Bemerkningerunclassified