2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10040444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological Taxonomy of Water Distribution Networks

Abstract: Water Distribution Networks (WDNs) can be regarded as complex networks and modeled as graphs. In this paper, Complex Network Theory is applied to characterize the behavior of WDNs from a topological point of view, reviewing some basic metrics, exploring their fundamental properties and the relationship between them. The crucial aim is to understand and describe the topology of WDNs and their structural organization to provide a novel tool of analysis which could help to find new solutions to several arduous pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
1
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
67
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, because of the differences in hydraulic behavior between a tree-like network and a real-life looped network, when OPUS is used in small WDSs, the results are not as good as expected because that difference in hydraulics is higher in smaller networks. In addition, Giudicianni (2018) found that there are several topological differences between small, large and synthetic WDNs (Water Distribution Networks) [51,56], thus it is possible to state that one methodology fits for some kind of networks but not for others. In this case, the result was highly influenced by the optimization process and not by the steps based on hydraulic principles, as a result of the fact that the design is executed based on the branched network (spanning tree).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, because of the differences in hydraulic behavior between a tree-like network and a real-life looped network, when OPUS is used in small WDSs, the results are not as good as expected because that difference in hydraulics is higher in smaller networks. In addition, Giudicianni (2018) found that there are several topological differences between small, large and synthetic WDNs (Water Distribution Networks) [51,56], thus it is possible to state that one methodology fits for some kind of networks but not for others. In this case, the result was highly influenced by the optimization process and not by the steps based on hydraulic principles, as a result of the fact that the design is executed based on the branched network (spanning tree).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nodal degree, k i , is the number of edges attached to a vertex i. The degree of node i is defined as k i = n j=1 A ij for the adjacency matrix A, and k i = n j=1 W ij for the weighted adjacency matrix W. From a topological point of view and complex network theory, Giudicianni et al [35] treated the WDN as a graph by using several complex network metrics to characterize the topology of typical WDNs. It was a preliminary process for better understanding the network itself, and provided the classical approach for partitioning or/and designing the WDNs.…”
Section: Graph Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suitable number of clusters C is taken in order to optimise the overall connectivity of the partitioned network. According to [19], the optimal number of clusters (from a topological point of view) results in C opt ∝ n 0.28 . Thus, without loss of generality, the new number of clusters for Parete is set to C = 4 (see Figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Dynamic Dma Configuration For Parete Wdsmentioning
confidence: 99%