2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TOPoS

Abstract: HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des labor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy of different GSE selections was already discussed by Bonifacio et al (2021), as they also found lower metallicities than Naidu et al (2020) and Feuillet et al (2020). While different metallicity scales of the different surveys could be the source of this disagreement, in this work, we demonstrate that the new selection within APOGEE DR16 by Feuillet et al (2021) and the selection by Das et al (2020), but with updated values from APOGEE DR16, show a disagreement.…”
Section: Our Selections Versus Otherssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancy of different GSE selections was already discussed by Bonifacio et al (2021), as they also found lower metallicities than Naidu et al (2020) and Feuillet et al (2020). While different metallicity scales of the different surveys could be the source of this disagreement, in this work, we demonstrate that the new selection within APOGEE DR16 by Feuillet et al (2021) and the selection by Das et al (2020), but with updated values from APOGEE DR16, show a disagreement.…”
Section: Our Selections Versus Otherssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Using the same selection as Feuillet et al (2020), but data from the TOPoS Survey, Bonifacio et al (2021) find a lower average metallicity of [M/H] ∼ −1.45 ± 0.3 (estimated by us based on their fig. 20).…”
Section: Iron Abundance [Fe/h] As Metallicity Tracermentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 9 presents the position of the two stars (blue triangle and orange square for TYC 622–742–1 and TYC 1193–1918–1, respectively) in planes used to isolate GSE, employing Galactocentric cylindrical velocities (VT, VR, VZ, top panels), the vertical component of the angular momentum (LZ, bottom panels), the orbital energy ( E , bottom‐right panel), and the radial action (its square root JR, bottom‐left panel). As a reference sample, stars of the “good parallax” sub‐sample analyzed in Bonifacio et al (2021) are also plotted in gray scale. The red‐shaded area in the bottom‐left panel corresponds to the criteria defined in Feuillet et al (2020) to select GSE stars, namely −500 kpc kmnormals1 <LZ<500 kpc kmnormals1 and 30<JR<50.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottom panels: position of the target stars in the orbital Energy (right) and JR (left) versus LZ planes. Stars from the good parallax sample of Bonifacio et al (2021) are shown as black dots. The red‐shaded area in the bottom‐left panel outlines the region defined in Feuillet et al (2020) to select GSE stars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%