Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1989.100131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torque limited path following by on-line trajectory time scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of generating time-optimal, dynamicallyfeasible trajectory of a given path without considering contact was initially solved by Bobrow et al [4] and Shin and McKay [26] and later enhanced by [7,8,18,27]. Recent work has extended the time-scaling problem to handle frictional contact [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of generating time-optimal, dynamicallyfeasible trajectory of a given path without considering contact was initially solved by Bobrow et al [4] and Shin and McKay [26] and later enhanced by [7,8,18,27]. Recent work has extended the time-scaling problem to handle frictional contact [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Pfeiffer & Johanni, 1987)) and also will be necessary in the results exposed in this chaper. The motion specification is completed by specifying a timing law (Hollerbach, 1984): (Dahl, 1990).…”
Section: D Qs Dsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The path acceleration σ in equation (11) is expressed in terms of the time-scaling factor () ct , the parameter () st , and successive time derivatives. In this way, instead of constraining the path acceleration () t σ , as done in (Dahl & Nielsen, 1990;Dahl, 1992), for enforcing the control torque into the admissible limits, it is possible to constrain the scaling acceleration () ct using the limits of torque input for each joint i , that is to say …”
Section: Tracking Control Of On-line Time-scaled Reference Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations