1994
DOI: 10.1002/jab.770050402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torsional properties of healed canine diaphyseal defects grafted with a fibrillar collagen and hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate composite

Abstract: The need for alternatives to autogenous bone grafts is widely recognized. This study compared the torsional strength of canine femora 1 year after grafting with one of three forms of a collagen/hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate bone grafting material (COLLAGRAFTTM), autogenous bone, or no graft. The groups were compared to each other and to the unoperated contralateral femora. Results of torsional testing were evaluated for torsional strength, torsional displacement, total energy to fracture and White fractu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defect repair did not depend on whether or not bone marrow was adsorbed to the subchondral support (i.e., group 4 versus group 3), a finding that can be explained by the fact that implants in both groups were exposed to marrow from the bleeding subchondral bone of the host. Whereas the polyglycolic acid delivery vehicle can be expected to completely resorb over a period of 2 months in vivo (35), the hydroxyapatite component of the Collagraft was essentially nonresorbable (17). The continued presence of hydroxyapatite may have slowed regeneration of the subchondral bone, implying that composite design can potentially be improved by selecting a subchondral support that is biodegradable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defect repair did not depend on whether or not bone marrow was adsorbed to the subchondral support (i.e., group 4 versus group 3), a finding that can be explained by the fact that implants in both groups were exposed to marrow from the bleeding subchondral bone of the host. Whereas the polyglycolic acid delivery vehicle can be expected to completely resorb over a period of 2 months in vivo (35), the hydroxyapatite component of the Collagraft was essentially nonresorbable (17). The continued presence of hydroxyapatite may have slowed regeneration of the subchondral bone, implying that composite design can potentially be improved by selecting a subchondral support that is biodegradable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subchondral support was used to permit fixation of the engineered cartilage by press‐fit. Collagraft, an osteoconductive sponge (17), was selected as the subchondral support, because this biomaterial permitted suturing as well as individual adjustment of each graft such that its surface was flush with the host cartilage. The defect size was 7 mm long × 5 mm wide × 5 mm deep, because this size provided a stringent test system for osteochondral repair in which a large, confined defect in a rabbit knee joint was used in conjunction with a press‐fitted implant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been utilized to elicit the formation of bone in segmental defects and facilitate the healing process. These approaches have included the implantation of osteoconductive extracellular scaffolds10–12 and the implantation of bone morphogenetic proteins in various matrices 13, 14. Another concept is based upon ex vivo expansion of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) loaded onto a carrier system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Matrixes being investigated include tricalcium phosphate (TCP), 30 hydroxyapatite (HA), 22,37 collagen, 18,42 demineralized bone, 39 poly(lactic-glycolic acid), poly(lactic acid) poly(ethylene glycol) and others. 16,23,31,44 Bone-promoting proteins include the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP's), 11,20,29 transforming growth factor B's (TGF-'s) 1,6,15 platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), 32 growth hormone, 4,13 basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), 3 or combinations thereof. 28 However, demonstration of equality or superiority to the use of autogenous cancellous bone of these complex matrixes has not been firmly established in animal models of segmental bone defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%