We here respond to Staal's (2018) critique of the Brookline Principles on the Ethical Practice of Operational Psychology. Staal proclaimed that there are no major ethical problems in the domain of operational psychology, and, if there were, only operational psychologists would be qualified to address the problems. We respond to Staal by providing (a) background to the Brookline Workshop, (b) a case of abuse by a Behavioral Science Consultant psychologist at Guantánamo, (c) perspectives-ours and Staal's-on the ethics of operational psychology, (d) implications of the doctrine of civil-military relations, and (e) key considerations for ethics in operational psychology.
Public Significance StatementThe use of professional psychology to aid military and intelligence operations, known as operational psychology, is fraught with ethical challenges. The use of psychologists to design and implement torture and detainee abuse highlighted some of these challenges. The challenges are outlined and a solution consistent with military institutional structures is proposed. Any serious approach to the ethics of operational psychology will need to confront these challenges, whether or not this specific solution is accepted.