2015
DOI: 10.14740/gr642w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total and Segmental Colon Transit Time Study in Functional Constipation: Comparison With Healthy Subjects

Abstract: BackgroundConstipation is a common problem worldwide. Constipation can be primary or secondary. Primary constipation is subdivided in slow transit constipation, normal transit constipation, and dyssynergic defecation. Colon transit time (CTT) is the most basic and primary tool in evaluating disorders of colonic motility. CTT helps to differentiate between types of constipation and plan the treatment.MethodsFifty functional constipation patients and 25 healthy controls were asked to ingest four gelatin capsules… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean TCTT of healthy controls in our study was 20.9 h; it is even lower in some Indian populations (e.g. 15.4 h 16 in adults and 16.2 h in children 17 ). Interval time of 24 h was used in colonic transit test for populations with mean colonic transit time of about 40 h. So, for populations with only half or less of the mean TCTT of Western populations, it is reasonable to decrease the interval time too.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The mean TCTT of healthy controls in our study was 20.9 h; it is even lower in some Indian populations (e.g. 15.4 h 16 in adults and 16.2 h in children 17 ). Interval time of 24 h was used in colonic transit test for populations with mean colonic transit time of about 40 h. So, for populations with only half or less of the mean TCTT of Western populations, it is reasonable to decrease the interval time too.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Retention of ≄ 30 radio-opaque markers at 36 h (sensitivity 90%, specificity 82%) and ≄ 14 markers at 60 h (sensitivity 95%, specificity 100%) was quite accurate to detect slow colon transit and FED as causes for CC [ 116 ]. Two other Indian centers reported similar results using this modified protocol [ 117 , 11 ].…”
Section: Consensus Statementsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Different populations may have shorter average transit times and require an adaptation of the marker methods shown in Western populations. For example, in a study of functional constipation in Indian patients, the participants were asked to ingest a capsule containing 5 markers at time 0, 12 and 24 h followed by X-ray at 36 h after the first ingestion, showing a colon transit time much shorter than in the Western populations [38] Another version of this technique involves the use of multiple capsules with markers of different geometric shapes. The capsules with markers are taken daily for three days, and abdominal X-rays are performed once or twice (usually 4 days and 7 days after administration).…”
Section: X-ray Radiopaque Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different populations may have shorter average transit times and require an adaptation of the marker methods shown in Western populations. For example, in a study of functional constipation in Indian patients, the participants were asked to ingest a capsule containing 5 markers at time 0, 12 and 24 h followed by X-ray at 36 h after the first ingestion, showing a colon transit time much shorter than in the Western populations [38].…”
Section: X-ray Radiopaque Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%