Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Methods for Nonlinear Control 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73890-9_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Energy Shaping Control of Mechanical Systems: Simplifying the Matching Equations Via Coordinate Changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limiting the algebraic solution to the potential‐energy PDE simplifies the control law (37) and preserves the mechanical structure of the closed‐loop system (32) on the extended state space. Notably, while the kinetic‐energy PDE can be reduced to ordinary differential equations or to algebraic equations for different classes of systems under some assumptions, 4,37 this is not the case for the potential‐energy PDE. Finally, the disturbance compensation controller (40) can in principle be used with different definitions of algebraic solution besides the one proposed in (35).…”
Section: Underactuated Mechanical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limiting the algebraic solution to the potential‐energy PDE simplifies the control law (37) and preserves the mechanical structure of the closed‐loop system (32) on the extended state space. Notably, while the kinetic‐energy PDE can be reduced to ordinary differential equations or to algebraic equations for different classes of systems under some assumptions, 4,37 this is not the case for the potential‐energy PDE. Finally, the disturbance compensation controller (40) can in principle be used with different definitions of algebraic solution besides the one proposed in (35).…”
Section: Underactuated Mechanical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is nonzero, seriously complicating the kinetic energy PDE. In [3], a coordinate transformation is proposed such that the PDEs become solvable. Applying the technique developed in [3], we can derive the solution obtained in [6] without partial feedback linearization.…”
Section: B Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of the method is limited by the possibility of solving two partial differential equations (PDEs) which identify the kinetic and potential energy functions that can be assigned to the closed-loop. Therefore, current research focusses on developing methods that make IDA-PBC applicable to a broader class of systems; especially [3] shows encouraging progress on the matter, making it possible to derive state-feedback controllers for the Inverted Pendulum on a Cart and the Furuta Pendulum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simplify the PDE problem Viola et al (2007) have introduced a change of coordinates and a modification of the target dynamics. With the objective to completely avoid PDEs, the following leading methods have been proposed: constructive procedures (Donaire et al, 2016a;Borja et al, 2016;Romero et al, 2017), implicit port-Hamiltonian representation (Macchelli, 2014;Castaños and Gromov, 2016) and an algebraic approach Batlle et al, 2007;Nunna et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%