1985
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1985.10465909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Inorganic Nitrate (Particulate Nitrate and Nitric Acid) Observations in Calgary, Alberta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our values are far below rural (i.e., non-urban areas without local point sources) levels reported for eastern North America (e.g., 2.2-5.9 ug/m 3 , see Daum et al 1989, for rural Ontario;Wolff andKorsog 1989, for rural Massachusetts, andLewin et al 1986 for rural Pennsylvania). However, our particulate nitrate (Figure 2) levels were lower than other published values (e.g., 0.24 ug/m 3 in Peake et al 1985 vs. 1.0 ug/m 3 in Daum et al 1989). Wiersma étal.…”
Section: Data Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, our values are far below rural (i.e., non-urban areas without local point sources) levels reported for eastern North America (e.g., 2.2-5.9 ug/m 3 , see Daum et al 1989, for rural Ontario;Wolff andKorsog 1989, for rural Massachusetts, andLewin et al 1986 for rural Pennsylvania). However, our particulate nitrate (Figure 2) levels were lower than other published values (e.g., 0.24 ug/m 3 in Peake et al 1985 vs. 1.0 ug/m 3 in Daum et al 1989). Wiersma étal.…”
Section: Data Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The average concentration over the 29 month sampling period, for nitrates and nitric acid (n = 94), respectively, was 0.13 and 0.60 ug/m 3 . In general, our nitric acid concentrations ( Figure 3) were slightly higher than at other remote sites: 0.24 ug/m 3 (Alberta, Peake et al 1985); 0.13 ug/m 3 (Nova Scotia, Smith-Palmer and Wentzell 1987); and 0.51 ug/m 3 (Whiteface Mountain "clean air", New York, Kelly et al 1984). In contrast, our values are far below rural (i.e., non-urban areas without local point sources) levels reported for eastern North America (e.g., 2.2-5.9 ug/m 3 , see Daum et al 1989, for rural Ontario;Wolff andKorsog 1989, for rural Massachusetts, andLewin et al 1986 for rural Pennsylvania).…”
Section: Data Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 73%