2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees: Predictive preoperative parameters influencing a constrained design selection

Abstract: Therapeutic retrospective study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…No mention was made about the influence of bone loss on the use of a CCK prosthesis. Moreover, most of the recent studies on CCK results have been performed in (difficult) primary knee replacements [16][17][18], whereas bone loss is rarely encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No mention was made about the influence of bone loss on the use of a CCK prosthesis. Moreover, most of the recent studies on CCK results have been performed in (difficult) primary knee replacements [16][17][18], whereas bone loss is rarely encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condylar constrained knee (CCK) prostheses are semi-constrained nonhinged implants, which represent an excellent alternative to the hinged prostheses. CCK systems have been introduced more recently, being more suitable in cases of intermediate severity with insufficiency (but not absence) of the ligaments and moderate bone loss [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sigma TC3; DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction, Leeds, UK) [7], an RH implant should be used instead of a CC implant when the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is absent. Many papers support the use of CC over PS-TKA when the MCL is present and lax, and the use of a RH over CC-TKA with absence of the MCL [10, 11, 23, 32]. This is not always followed clinically as surgeons would prefer to minimise size and constraint of the implant and still achieve stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constrained condylar TKA (CCK) system is recommended for patients having an unstable knee with severe deformity, medial collateral ligament (MCL) deficiency, and inadequate soft tissue balance during flexion and extension. Although constrained condylar implants provide reliable clinical outcomes (12) (13), these implants use modular stem extensions for both tibial and femoral components, which sometimes cause technical difficulties, increase the risk of large bone stockdeficiencies, and affect the implant longevity (14) (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%