2020
DOI: 10.3390/cells9030759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total mRNA Quantification in Single Cells: Sarcoma Cell Heterogeneity

Abstract: Single-cell analysis enables detailed molecular characterization of cells in relation to cell type, genotype, cell state, temporal variations, and microenvironment. These studies often include the analysis of individual genes and networks of genes. The total amount of RNA also varies between cells due to important factors, such as cell type, cell size, and cell cycle state. However, there is a lack of simple and sensitive methods to quantify the total amount of RNA, especially mRNA. Here, we developed a method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Levels of mRNA were quantified by a Smart‐seq2‐based approach as described before (Picelli et al , 2014; Jonasson et al , 2020). Briefly, RNA was purified from 10 × 10 6 cultured cells using the NucleoSpin RNA kit (Macherey‐Nagel) and eluted in 60 μl water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of mRNA were quantified by a Smart‐seq2‐based approach as described before (Picelli et al , 2014; Jonasson et al , 2020). Briefly, RNA was purified from 10 × 10 6 cultured cells using the NucleoSpin RNA kit (Macherey‐Nagel) and eluted in 60 μl water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have also been made to measure total mRNA levels in single cells, for instance using global reverse transcription followed by quantitative PCR (Jonasson et al, 2020). A different approach, which relies on an additional step during library preparation, is the inclusion of external RNA spike-in molecules, as suggested by the External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) (Lichun et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm conclusions solely made on the basis of scRNA-seq, it is common practice to validate expression data by scRT-qPCR [26] primarily to control the elevated amount of technical noise and thus dropouts. Several scRT-qPCR workflows have been described [27][28][29][30][31] as well as a few scRT-ddPCR workflows [32][33][34]. The majority of these workflows use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for single-cell isolation [28,29,31,32,35], while other studies use microfluidic devices [33,34], micromanipulators [27] or manual cell picking [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, DE analysis from scRNA-seq must be independently confirmed by single-cell PCR [25]. Several scRT-qPCR workflows have been described [26][27][28][29][30] as well as a few scRT-ddPCR workflows [31][32][33]. The majority of these workflows use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for single-cell isolation [27,28,30,31,34], while other studies use microfluidic devices [32,33], micromanipulators [26] or manual cell picking [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%