Tourism, Trade and Domestic Welfare

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The opinions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the position of Terms of use: Documents in Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Tourism, Trade and Domestic Welfare SummaryTourism has been regarded as a major source of economic growth and a good source of foreign exchange earnings. Tourism has also been considered as an activity that imposes costs on the host country. Such costs include increased pollution, congestion and despoliation of fragile environments and intra-generational inequity aggravation. One aspect that has been ignored is the general equilibrium effects of tourism on the other sectors in the economy. These effects can be quite substantial and should be taken into account when assessing the net benefits of a tourism boom on an economy. This paper presents a model which captures the interdependence between tourism and the rest of the economy, in particular agriculture and manufacturing. We examine the effect of a tourist boom on structural adjustment, commodity and factor prices and more importantly resident welfare. An important result obtained is that the tourist boom may "immiserize" the residents. This occurs because of two effects. The first, a favourable effect due to an increase in the relative price of the non-traded good which is termed the secondary terms of trade effect. The second, a negative effect due to an efficiency loss that occurs in the presence of increasing returns to scale in manufacturing. If this second effect outweighs the first effect, resident immiserization occurs.

Is the Growth of Tourism-specialised Economies Sustainable? A Case Study of Sanya and Zhangjiajie in China

“…In addition, tourism specialisation may result in the de-industrialisation of other economic sectors, which subsequently reduce long-term economic growth (Adams & Parmenter, 1995;Capo, Font, & Nadal, 2007;Chao, Hazari, Laffargue, Sgro, & Yu, 2006;Copeland, 1991;Nowak, Sahli, & Sgro, 2003). This phenomenon is called the "Dutch Disease Effect", which has rarely been focused on in previous tourism studies (Parrilla et al, 2007) except for several empirical studies.…”

Taxing tourism: enhancing or reducing welfare?

“…Similarly, Jensen and Wanhill (2002) suspect that worldwide increases in both numbers and rates of tourism taxes in recent years are not welfare-enhancing, since destinations' governments seem to consider tourism taxes as "easy money", giving them license to deviate from economic rationality. The past literature includes a number of studies on the impact of tourism taxes on destinations' welfare, often with controversial findings (Bird, 1992;Clark & Ng, 1993;Dimanche, 2003;Forsyth & Dwyer, 2002;Gago, Labandeira, Picos, & Rodriguez, 2009;Levine, 2003;Litvin, Crotts, Blackwell, & Styles, 2006;Mak, 1988;Mayor & Tol, 2007;Nowak, Sali, & Sgro, 2003;Palmer & Riera 2003;Palmer-Tous, Riera-Font, & Rosselló-Nadal, 2007;Piga, 2003).…”

Tourism Industry and Economic Growth Nexus in Beijing, China

“…Tourism has been considered as a critical foundation of economic growth. Nowak et al (2003) stated that to redouble tourism with economic growth, many governments carry out projects about infrastructure services. The importance and form of tourism have mostly changed especially, after 1990, by the effect of globalization.…”