2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a 3D kinetic tomography of Taurus clouds. I. Linking neutral potassium and dust

Abstract: Context. Gaia parallaxes and photometric measurements open a three-dimensional (3D) era for the Milky Way, including its interstellar (IS) matter. Three-dimensional Galactic dust distributions are constructed in various ways, based on Gaia data and photometric or spectroscopic surveys. Aims. The assignment of radial motions to IS dust structures seen in 3D, or 3D kinetic tomography, would be a valuable tool allowing one to connect the structures to emission lines of the associated gas, which are now measured a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hierarchical inversion is using extinction catalogues from Sanders & Das (2018) and Queiroz et al (2020) that are based on major spectroscopic surveys, and, during the inversion, the map presented in Lallement et al (2019), which is based on photometry from Gaia and the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS), is used as a prior distribution and as a final solution in regions of space devoid of spectroscopic survey targets. A more detailed description of this type of data combination, for Sanders & Das (2018) data solely, can be found in Ivanova et al (2021). This 4 × 4 × 0.8 kpc 3 new map (X, Y axes in the plane and Z-axis along Galactic poles) is particularly well suited for nearby stellar sources such as white dwarfs, because spectroscopic surveys are generally targeting brighter, closer stars.…”
Section: D Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchical inversion is using extinction catalogues from Sanders & Das (2018) and Queiroz et al (2020) that are based on major spectroscopic surveys, and, during the inversion, the map presented in Lallement et al (2019), which is based on photometry from Gaia and the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS), is used as a prior distribution and as a final solution in regions of space devoid of spectroscopic survey targets. A more detailed description of this type of data combination, for Sanders & Das (2018) data solely, can be found in Ivanova et al (2021). This 4 × 4 × 0.8 kpc 3 new map (X, Y axes in the plane and Z-axis along Galactic poles) is particularly well suited for nearby stellar sources such as white dwarfs, because spectroscopic surveys are generally targeting brighter, closer stars.…”
Section: D Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T eff values were derived adopting the (BP − RP) 0 -T eff transformation from Mucciarelli et al (2021). Colour excesses were estimated from integration within 3D extinction maps (Ivanova et al 2021) except for the star HE0401-0138, for which we adopted the value from Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011). For very distant halo stars that fall outside the maps, we used the upper limits based on dust emission from Planck Collaboration Int.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T eff have been derived adopting the (BP − RP) 0 -T eff transformation by Mucciarelli, Bellazzini & Massari (2021). Colour excesses are estimated from integration within 3D extinction maps (Ivanova et al 2021) but for the star HE0401-0138, for which we adopted the value by Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011). For very distant halo stars falling out of the maps, we used the upper limits based on dust emission from Planck Collaboration et al ( 2016), in all cases very close to the value achieved at the map boundary.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%