2020
DOI: 10.26107/rbz-2020-0085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a better understanding of habituation process to human observer: A statistical approach in Macaca leonina (Primates: Cercopithecidea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nutritional geometry approach has thus been extended to observational studies of animals in the wild. These studies have principally involved primates, because they readily habituate to the presence of researchers, mostly have defined home ranges, and form stable social groups, all of which make it possible to collect detailed feeding data over timescales that would be difficult or impossible for many other taxa [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutritional geometry approach has thus been extended to observational studies of animals in the wild. These studies have principally involved primates, because they readily habituate to the presence of researchers, mostly have defined home ranges, and form stable social groups, all of which make it possible to collect detailed feeding data over timescales that would be difficult or impossible for many other taxa [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…≥100 km 2 as in our study framework) is difficult, and primates that can be hard to detect present particular challenges (Buckland et al 2010). In fact, estimating population abundance and distribution can be resource-intensive and time-consuming, because primate species often live in remote, densely vegetated areas; they are cryptic, can occur at low densities, occupy a large home range, are highly mobile, and are likely to respond to the presence of a researcher without previous habituation (Keane et al 2012;Gazagne et al 2020a). These ecological characteristics fall within the assumptions of many survey techniques, including imperfect detection, where animals are not detected even if they are present in the sampled area (MacKenzie et al 2002;Tyre et al 2003) or nonlinear relationships between the number of encounters and effort devoted to searching (Keane et al 2011;MacKenzie et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, contrary to other species, most data on primate habitat selection and distribution come from animals habituated to human observers, which can be a highly timeconsuming process (e.g. >7 years for western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla); Doran-Sheehy et al (2007), 5-15 years for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes); Bertolani and Boesch (2008), >7 months for moor macaque (Macaca maura); Hanson and Riley (2018), and >13 months for northern pigtailed macaque (Macaca leonina); Gazagne et al (2020a)). However, because of escalating anthropogenic pressure on primates and their habitat, nearly 60% of primate species are now threatened with extinction and 75% have declining populations worldwide (Estrada et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ordinarily, the risk perceived by animals and the associated human disturbance effects should increase as the number of humans in an area increases (Beale & Monaghan, 2004), but habituation or tolerance to non-lethal human presence may cause a waning of responses to humans, thereby resulting in a decline of sensitivity (shorter FID) as the number of people in an area increases (Mikula, 2014;Webb & Blumstein, 2005). Many studies have shown the behavioural waning of responsiveness by wildlife to repeated, non-lethal stimuli over time (Cavalli et al, 2018;Gazagne et al, 2020;Raderschall et al, 2011;Rankin et al, 2009;Whittaker & Knight, 1998). Wildlife is therefore expected to be more habituated to humans in sites with greater human use (Mbise et al, 2020;Rodriguez-Prieto et al, 2009;Webb & Blumstein, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%