2006
DOI: 10.1080/14797580500422018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Decolonizing Indigenous Psychology in the Philippines: Introducing Sikolohiyang Pilipino

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sikolohiyang Pilipino is a native 'epistemology' that emphasises Filipino culture as source, providing a 'perspective' that is both liberated from and liberating of Western influences (predominantly those of the US). Likewise, it is a 'movement' that seeks to overcome Euro/Western-centric neocolonial thought and structures present in local knowledge production (San Juan, 2006). Sikolohiyang Pilipino privileges the aspirations of all Filipinos, especially of the non-elite and indigenous peoples, through the body of knowledge it presents for the construction of Filipino socio-cultural realities, national identity, consciousness and worldview (Pe-Pua & Protacio-Marcelino, 2000).…”
Section: Towards Decolonising Philippine Tourism and Hospitality Resementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sikolohiyang Pilipino is a native 'epistemology' that emphasises Filipino culture as source, providing a 'perspective' that is both liberated from and liberating of Western influences (predominantly those of the US). Likewise, it is a 'movement' that seeks to overcome Euro/Western-centric neocolonial thought and structures present in local knowledge production (San Juan, 2006). Sikolohiyang Pilipino privileges the aspirations of all Filipinos, especially of the non-elite and indigenous peoples, through the body of knowledge it presents for the construction of Filipino socio-cultural realities, national identity, consciousness and worldview (Pe-Pua & Protacio-Marcelino, 2000).…”
Section: Towards Decolonising Philippine Tourism and Hospitality Resementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather it is maka-Pilipino (Lavides, Waring, Hanna, & Nakhid, 2018;Santiago & Enriquez, 1976). In other words, it is a psychology of, and developed by and for, the Filipino (San Juan, 2006), promoting the interests of all Filipinos and their various life spheres (today, including tourism). Informed by this 'native epistemology', the decolonisation agenda fostered in this paper is grounded in three aspects: topical, theoretical, and methodological (Church & Katigbak, 2002).…”
Section: Towards Decolonising Philippine Tourism and Hospitality Resementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this background, and maybe influenced by the massive liberation of African states from colonialism in the 1960s, in the 1970s there was a wave of nationalism in the Philippines which influenced the demand for indigenization of psychology. Many authors (e.g., Church & Katigbak, 2002;Gastardo-Conaco, 2005;Pe-Pua, 2015;Pe-Pua & Protacio-Marcelino, 2000;San Juan, 2006) have described the development of IP in the Philippines. D. Sinha (1997) argued that the indigenization of psychology in the Philippines was the strongest in Asia.…”
Section: Philippinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an important aim of SP is to correct previous conceptions of the "national traits" of the Filipino human being. San Juan (2006) observed that this implies that "the natives have suddenly bolted from slumber, it seems, and have begun to interpolate their own translation, and, in effect, represent themselves" (p. 50).…”
Section: Philippinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filipino psychology or Sikolohiyang Pilipino (SP) was first developed by Virgilio Enriquez as a response to the dominant usage of Western psychology in various academic and clinical settings in the Philippines (Church & Katigbak, 2002;Montiel & Teh, 2004;San Juan, 2006). Filipino scholars have criticized the application of some of the Western models of psychology, indicating that its usage promoted "intellectual dependence" (Church & Katigbak, 2002, p. 130) and "academic imperialism" (p. 130).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%