2005
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2005.857324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a direct comparison of field and laboratory goniometer measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus a correction factor compensating the conical effect of the light source as well as the non-Lambertian reflection behavior of the Spectralon reference panel was provided [16,30]. …”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus a correction factor compensating the conical effect of the light source as well as the non-Lambertian reflection behavior of the Spectralon reference panel was provided [16,30]. …”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both laboratory and field goniometer measurements have their advantages and disadvantages [22]. A drawback of using laboratory goniometry is that the observed target has to be taken out of its natural environment and that an artificial light source has to be used, which typically results in a non-parallel light beam as opposed to the natural illumination of the sun [23]. A positive aspect, on the other hand, is the full control over the position and stability of the light source during measurement acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the understory cannot be neglected in reflectance modeling in the case of low to intermediate canopy cover [7]. In conventional LAI retrieval algorithms, the understory reflectance is either given as fixed value for each wavelength [8] or modeled by simple bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) models based on field measurements [9,10]. In fact, large spatial and temporal variations in understory layers have been observed, even among the same species [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%