2021
DOI: 10.1017/s1759078721000088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a fully integrated automotive radar system-on-chip in 22 nm FD-SOI CMOS

Abstract: Next-generation automotive radar sensors are increasingly becoming sensitive to cost and size, which will leverage monolithically integrated radar system-on-Chips (SoC). This article discusses the challenges and the opportunities of the integration of the millimeter-wave frontend along with the digital backend. A 76–81 GHz radar SoC is presented as an evaluation vehicle for an automotive, fully depleted silicon-over-insulator 22 nm CMOS technology. It features a digitally controlled oscillator, 2-millimeter-wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MMIC technology enables the development of highly integrated systems, reducing their volume and power requirements [79]. Modern automotive radar integrates the MMIC, transmitters, receivers, microcontroller, and other signal processing units into one integrated unit [80]. Generally, automotive radars are FMCW and are able to provide information relative to the range, Doppler (speed), and azimuth [81].…”
Section: Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMIC technology enables the development of highly integrated systems, reducing their volume and power requirements [79]. Modern automotive radar integrates the MMIC, transmitters, receivers, microcontroller, and other signal processing units into one integrated unit [80]. Generally, automotive radars are FMCW and are able to provide information relative to the range, Doppler (speed), and azimuth [81].…”
Section: Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of two different VCOs offers the possibility to optimize the oscillator performance intended for different applications, e.g., a VCO with smaller frequency tuning range, but lower phase noise for the long range radar (LRR) application or a VCO with larger frequency tuning range, but higher phase noise for short range radar (SRR) application. 5 Furthermore this architecture makes it possible to compare the performance of two different VCO implementations in a simple and cost-effective way. The first oscillator, VCO1, is designed as a push-push VCO at a fundamental frequency of 20 GHz optimized for low phase noise (e.g., −100 dBc/Hz @ 1 MHz at the 77/79 GHz output), while the second oscillator, VCO2, is developed at a fundamental frequency of 26 GHz including the direct extraction of the third harmonic signal from the VCO core and offering a very large total tuning range (e.g., >11 GHz at the 77/79 GHz output).…”
Section: Transmitter Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in Section I, it is common to implement a lower frequency VCO and then multiply this frequency to the desired frequency [3], [4], [5], [13]. With this frequency multiplication together with the above mentioned VCO architectures, a low CMOS VCO phase noise is achieved which is comparable to that of SiGe HBT VCOs (even at lower phase noise offset frequency range) [13], [17], [18].…”
Section: A 77 Ghz Signal Sources Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations