2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781351301527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a General Theory of Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0
17

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
109
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hofstede (, p. 9) treats culture as ‘the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from another’ and he explains that the ‘mind’ stands for thinking, feeling and acting. Cultures can be characterised by the help of distinct dimensions and many different sets of dimensions can be found in literature in order to classify cultures (for example, Parsons & Shils ; Kluckhohn & Strodbeck ; Schwartz ; Inglehart & Baker ; House et al . ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hofstede (, p. 9) treats culture as ‘the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from another’ and he explains that the ‘mind’ stands for thinking, feeling and acting. Cultures can be characterised by the help of distinct dimensions and many different sets of dimensions can be found in literature in order to classify cultures (for example, Parsons & Shils ; Kluckhohn & Strodbeck ; Schwartz ; Inglehart & Baker ; House et al . ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Western societies, masculine and feminine personality traits are associated with instrumental agentic and communal expressive tendencies, respectively (Parsons & Shils, 1952). Instrumental agentic tendencies are concerned with the pursuit of goals that have personal consequences (Meyers-Levy, 1988).…”
Section: Gender Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norms fall at the boundaries and interstices of the social sciences. Research is scattered across disparate literatures in sociology (Parsons & Shils, 1951), anthropology (Geertz, 1973), economics (Akerlof, 1976), political science (Axelrod, 1985), psychology (Ajzen, 1991;Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990), public health (Neighbors et al, 2008), organizational behavior (Pillutla & Chen, 1999), and marketing (Englis & Solomon, 1995). Some disciplines, such as economics, study norms in the objective patterns of behavior in a social environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%