2002
DOI: 10.1006/ecss.2001.0917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Predictive Understanding of Primary Productivity in a Temperate, Partially Stratified Estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
141
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
15
141
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is general agreement in y values for several light-limited, nutrient-replete system (Brush et al 2002), investigators working in other estuaries have also reported significant spatial and temporal variation in y (e.g., Pennock and Sharp 1986;Kromkamp et al 1995;Falkowski and Raven 2002;Harding et al 2002). For example, Harding et al (2002) found that the light-utilization model was a poor predictor of primary production from samples taken throughout the Chesapeake Bay during 1982-2000, whereas Kromkamp et al (1995) reported variation in y of more than threefold across locations in the Scheldt Estuary during a single sampling date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is general agreement in y values for several light-limited, nutrient-replete system (Brush et al 2002), investigators working in other estuaries have also reported significant spatial and temporal variation in y (e.g., Pennock and Sharp 1986;Kromkamp et al 1995;Falkowski and Raven 2002;Harding et al 2002). For example, Harding et al (2002) found that the light-utilization model was a poor predictor of primary production from samples taken throughout the Chesapeake Bay during 1982-2000, whereas Kromkamp et al (1995) reported variation in y of more than threefold across locations in the Scheldt Estuary during a single sampling date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Harding et al (2002) found that the light-utilization model was a poor predictor of primary production from samples taken throughout the Chesapeake Bay during 1982-2000, whereas Kromkamp et al (1995) reported variation in y of more than threefold across locations in the Scheldt Estuary during a single sampling date. The spatial and temporal variability of y observed here for the SFE suggests that other factors besides those captured by the composite parameter may play a previously underappreciated role in determining ΣP in the SFE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above-mentioned parameters have been used, along with irradiance, as the basis of numerous bio-optical models to derive estimates of PP (e.g. Smith et al 1989, Harding et al 2002. As a summary of recent progress, Behrenfeld & Falkowski (1997) presented a classification system for determining daily PP depending on the level of integration over depth/time/spectral scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the idea that the inability in the simulation of anoxia in the channel may be due in part to the lack of transport of volatile suspended sediments from the shallows to the channel, and that implementing movement of particulate organics along slopes can improve the simulation. In models of this type without an explicit simulation of resuspension and transport of particulate organics this approach may be important in order to represent the role of primary production and its fate [11]. Fig.…”
Section: Comparing Do Simulations By Slope Movement and The Initial Mmentioning
confidence: 99%