Toward a Unified Treatment for Emotional Disorders

Barlow, David H.; Allen, Laura B.; Choate, Molly L.

doi:10.4324/9781315724539-12

Cited by 144 publications

(211 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

190

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Of particular importance to transfer effects of CBM‐I for anxiety symptoms, interpretation bias has been linked to psychophysiological reactivity in anxious youth (Rozenman, Vreeland, & Piacentini, 2017) and adults with elevated anxiety symptoms (Gonzalez, Rozenman, Goger, & Velasco, in preparation). This empirical relationship supports theoretical models of anxiety, which propose both cognitive and physiological mechanisms (Barlow, Allen, & Choate, 2004; MacLeod, Campbell, Rutherford, & Wilson, 2004). Moreover, the child literature indicates that experimentally modifying interpretation bias (Lester, Field, & Muris, 2011) or beliefs about stress reactivity (Muris, Mayer, & Bervoets, 2010) influences the other domain.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Cognitive bias modification for threat interpretations: Impact on anxiety symptoms and stress reactivity

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cognitive bias modification for interpretations (CBM-I) is a computerized intervention that has received increasing attention in the last decade as a potential experimental intervention for anxiety. Initial CBM-I trials with clinical populations suggest the potential utility of this approach. However, most CBM-I experiments have been conducted with unaffected samples, few (one or two) training sessions, and have not examined transfer effects to anxiety-related constructs such as stress reactivity.Method: This study compared a 12-session CBM-I intervention (n = 12) to an interpretation control condition (ICC; n = 12) in individuals (N = 24) with elevated trait anxiety on interpretation bias, anxiety symptom, and stress reactivity outcomes (electrodermal activity, heart rate, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia).

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Cognitive bias modification for threat interpretations: Impact on anxiety symptoms and stress reactivity

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Based on previous ED network results, we predicted that the most central ED nodes would be shape and weight concerns (DuBois, Rogers, Franko, Eddy, & Thomas, ; Forrest et al, ; Goldschmidt et al, ; Levinson et al, ). Based on transdiagnostic frameworks of anxiety disorders (Barlow, Allen, & Choate, ) and anxiety factor analytic and network research (Beard et al, ; Bieling, Antony, & Swinson, ; Levinson et al, ), we predicted that the most central trait anxiety nodes would be excessive worry and physiological hyperarousal.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bridging eating disorder symptoms and trait anxiety in patients with eating disorders: A network approach

Forrest

Sarfan

Ortiz

et al. 2019

Intl J Eating Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Anxiety is thought to influence the development and maintenance of eating disorders (EDs). However, little is known about how, specifically, anxiety influences ED symptoms and vice versa. Network analysis identifies how symptoms within and across disorders are interconnected. In a network, central nodes (i.e., symptoms) have the strongest relations to other nodes and are thought to maintain psychopathology. Bridge nodes are symptoms in one diagnostic cluster that are strongly connected to symptoms in another diagnostic cluster and are thought to explain comorbidity. We identified central and bridge nodes in a network of ED symptoms and trait anxiety features.Method: We estimated a regularized partial correlation network in patients with mixed EDs (N = 296). ED symptoms were assessed with the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. Trait anxiety was assessed with the Trait subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Items to include in the network were selected with a statistical algorithm to ensure that all nodes represented unique constructs. Central and bridge nodes were identified with empirical calculations.Results: Central ED nodes were dietary restraint, as well as overvaluation of and dissatisfaction with shape and weight. The central trait anxiety node was low feelings of satisfaction. The strongest ED bridge node was avoidance of social eating. The strongest trait anxiety bridge node was low self-confidence.

show abstract

“…Los primeros tratamientos transdiagnósticos denominados como tales fueron desarrollados por el grupo de Fairburn (2003) y dirigidos al tratamiento de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria. Posteriormente, el grupo de David Barlow (Barlow, Allen, & Choate, 2004) elaboró un modelo de psicoterapia unificada para el tratamiento de los trastornos emocionales y es con el texto de psicoterapia transdiagnósticas de Harvey, Watkins, Mansell y Shafran (2004), cuando cobran su mayoría de edad gracias a la descripción de las alteraciones de los procesos básicos subyacentes de manera transversal en los trastornos mentales. Ha habido múltiples publicaciones sobre esta temática y, concretamente, disponemos de diversos números monográficos como el primero que data del año 2009 en el Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (Taylor & Clark, 2009), el que fuera editado en nuestro país en la Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica en el año 2012 que ha suscitado un interés muy especial (Sandín, 2012) y otros en las revistas más relevantes de la psicología clínica como los de la Clinical Psychology Review (Mansell, 2011) o recientemente en el Journal of Anxiety Disorders (Norton, 2017).…”

Section: Presentaciónunclassified

Editorial: Avances en psicoterapias transdiagnósticas

Mirapeix¹,

Fernández‐Álvarez²

2018

rdp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Podríamos decir que con el Siglo XXI llega al campo de las psicoterapias uncambio de paradigma que comienza a trascender los sistemas categoriales quedirigieron la práctica clínica durante el último Siglo. En respuesta a las evidentesfalacias tanto epistemológicas como prácticas de los sistemas psicopatológicostradicionales, han surgido en los últimos años modelos que vienen a denominarsede forma genérica transdiagnósticos. La característica fundamental que define estegiro, estriba en establecer el foco de intervención en una serie de mecanismos deregulación cognitivo emocional, procesos específicos que subyacen a lapsicopatología clásica, factores predisponentes y precipitantes, marcadores estratégicos,entre otros. De este modo, se encuadra todo ello en lo que se denominanmecanismos transdiagnósticos, los cuales inspiran los focos de intervención delabordaje que adopta el mismo nombre.Por otro lado, y en sintonía a lo anterior, se ha alcanzado una mayor madurezrespecto a la necesidad creciente de adoptar modelos integradores en psicoterapia.Éstos han ido desarrollando modelos de intervención que persiguen la identificaciónde principios (Castonguay y Beutler, 2006) que permitan diseñar auténticosmodelos de intervención trascendiendo las diferencias entre los modelos teóricos.

show abstract

Toward a Unified Treatment for Emotional Disorders

Cited by 144 publications

References 1 publication

Cognitive bias modification for threat interpretations: Impact on anxiety symptoms and stress reactivity

Cognitive bias modification for threat interpretations: Impact on anxiety symptoms and stress reactivity

Bridging eating disorder symptoms and trait anxiety in patients with eating disorders: A network approach

Editorial: Avances en psicoterapias transdiagnósticas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About