64th EAGE Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2002
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.5.b024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Accurate Velocity Models by 3D Tomographic Velocity Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where F is the Frechet derivative matrix, m is the vector of attenuation perturbations that involve Q and a is the vector containing the logarithmic amplitude ratios. With appropriate preconditioning in the data and model space (Guo et al, 2002), the vector m, and hence Q, can be solved by standard methods such as least-squares conjugate gradient method.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F is the Frechet derivative matrix, m is the vector of attenuation perturbations that involve Q and a is the vector containing the logarithmic amplitude ratios. With appropriate preconditioning in the data and model space (Guo et al, 2002), the vector m, and hence Q, can be solved by standard methods such as least-squares conjugate gradient method.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tomographic MVA (e.g. Stork 1992; Kosloff et al 1996; Woodward et al 1998; Guo et al 2002), residual moveouts in common‐image gathers (CIGs) obtained by prestack depth migration are picked and converted into traveltime errors that are assigned to the corresponding specular rays. A model update is then calculated from these traveltime errors by tomographic inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%