1996
DOI: 10.2307/2399870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Improved Classification of Lauraceae

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Missouri Botanical Garden Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
106
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The genus comprises trees and rarely shrubs and is usually distinguished from other genera of the Lauraceae by the following characteristics: paniculate or racemose inflorescences that are not strictly cymose at the terminal division, bisexual and trimerous flowers with six equal to subequal tepals, six to nine fertile stamens representing the outer two or three whorls, two-celled anthers, and fruits lacking cupules. It is placed in the tribe Cryptocaryeae Nees together with other core genera such as Cryptocarya R.Br., Endiandra R.Br., and Potameia Thouars based on wood and bark anatomy and inflorescence structure (Van der Werff & Richter 1996). This classification is also supported by a molecular study (Chanderbali et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The genus comprises trees and rarely shrubs and is usually distinguished from other genera of the Lauraceae by the following characteristics: paniculate or racemose inflorescences that are not strictly cymose at the terminal division, bisexual and trimerous flowers with six equal to subequal tepals, six to nine fertile stamens representing the outer two or three whorls, two-celled anthers, and fruits lacking cupules. It is placed in the tribe Cryptocaryeae Nees together with other core genera such as Cryptocarya R.Br., Endiandra R.Br., and Potameia Thouars based on wood and bark anatomy and inflorescence structure (Van der Werff & Richter 1996). This classification is also supported by a molecular study (Chanderbali et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…About 50 genera are currently recognized with 2500-3000 species (Wood 1958, Rohwer 1993, van der Werff and Richter 1996. They are mainly distributed throughout the tropical and subtropical regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with stamen number, most genera have a constant number of cells per anther, but variation does occur in some ( Van der Werff & Richter 1996). All genera in Table 1 have 2-celled anthers, which are either introrse or extrorse.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Taxonomic Position Of Hexaporamentioning
confidence: 99%