2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an understanding of the stabilization mechanisms of lifted turbulent jet flames: Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
103
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The computations in [8] show that a smaller pipe diameter gives better penetration of the air and greater leaning-off of the mixture, leading to earlier localised flame extinctions and blow-off. 6 Details of how a blow-off develops were studied experimentally by AP at the State Key Laboratory in Fire Science, Hefei. Subsonic jet flames of methane and propane were employed, with pipe diameters ranging between 3 and 8 mm, as described in [4].…”
Section: Lift-off Distance Subsonic and Choked Blow-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The computations in [8] show that a smaller pipe diameter gives better penetration of the air and greater leaning-off of the mixture, leading to earlier localised flame extinctions and blow-off. 6 Details of how a blow-off develops were studied experimentally by AP at the State Key Laboratory in Fire Science, Hefei. Subsonic jet flames of methane and propane were employed, with pipe diameters ranging between 3 and 8 mm, as described in [4].…”
Section: Lift-off Distance Subsonic and Choked Blow-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the extensive experimental data on jet flame heights and lift-off distances is presented in [5]. The associated detailed flame structure of lifted hydrocarbon turbulent jet flames and their stability has been discussed by Lyons [6], along with a review of turbulent lifted flame theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combustion systems where the fuel is injected as a fuel-rich mixture, the flame propagates by partially premixed and turbulent triple flame processes [1]. Various studies of triple flames are reviewed by Lyons [26]. Triple flame stabilization is still not well understood but numerical and experimental studies suggest that a triple flame is less sensitive to strain than a pure diffusion flame and that triple flame displacement speeds can be several times greater than the laminar flame speed at stoichiometry [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the model to partially premixed and non-premixed combustion, a sensor S (constructed as a reaction rate) is used to trigger the TFLES model only in reactive areas without affecting inert mixing away from the flame front [40,57,58]. Finally, in non-reactive regions (S = 0, F = 1, E = 1), standard LES equations (without chemical source terms) apply and in the flame front (S = 1), thickened equations apply, with:ω Although this approach is still being developed and requires further validations, its simplicity and its success in prior applications [40,58,59] suggest its suitability for the problem addressed in this work where the propagation and stabilization processes of the turbulent lifted flame involve premixed and diffusion combustion regimes [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many explanations of the flame stabilization mechanism of turbulent lifted jet flames are available [1,2,3] which are utilized in this research in understanding lifted H 2 jet flame stability. Peters [4] explains that quenching near the nozzle due to excessive local strain rates precedes liftoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%