2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward assembling a taxonomic puzzle: Case study of Iranian gray voles of the subgenus Microtus (Rodentia, Cricetidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, the taxonomy of Microtus was mainly based on morphological differentiation, distinct karyotypes and different chromosome numbers [39,40]. However, some species have similar chromosome number and karyotype but appear morphologically different, while some are opposite [41,42]. Therefore, this genus clearly requires revision to fit phylogenetic relationships indicated by molecular data [10,11,37,43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past, the taxonomy of Microtus was mainly based on morphological differentiation, distinct karyotypes and different chromosome numbers [39,40]. However, some species have similar chromosome number and karyotype but appear morphologically different, while some are opposite [41,42]. Therefore, this genus clearly requires revision to fit phylogenetic relationships indicated by molecular data [10,11,37,43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular systematic analysis of Microtus based on molecular data including both mitochondrial and nuclear markers [49,50]. In the past decades, most phylogenetic studies focused on mt genomes and some species received a good distinction [41,51]. Recently, some researchers are beginning to use both mtDNA and nuclear DNA to analyze the phylogeny of genus Microtus and obtain good results [52–54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All species examined showed intrinsic postzygotic isolation in the form of hybrid sterility. This sterility is more advanced between M. kermanensis × M. arvalis and (Mahmoudi et al, 2017;Golenishchev et al, 2019); additionally, M. kermanensis does not share at least 14 chromosome rearrangements with M. arvalis and at least eight with M. transcaspicus (Mazurok et al, 2001).…”
Section: Species In the "Mystacinus" Group Had Already Evolved Male Hybrid Sterilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent revision ( Shenbrot and Krasnov, 2005 ; Pavlinov and Lissovsky, 2012 ; Golenishchev et al, 2019 ), the subgenus Microtus comprises six nominal forms: M. arvalis (Pallas, 1778) (with two karyoforms, “arvalis” and “obscurus”), M. rossiaemeridionalis (Ognev, 1924), M. ilaeus (Thomas, 1912), M. transcaspicus (Satunin, 1905), Microtus kermanensis (Roguin, 1988), and Microtus mystacinus (De Filippi, 1865). The former two sibling species occupy vast areas in Eurasia, cohabitating in most of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation