2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward automation in hearing aid design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lasers are used to represent objects and scenes using 3D graphical illustration (e.g., Livatino et al, 2010;Sickel et al, 2011) andrendering (e.g., Chuen Leong et al, 2010;Morioka et al, 2012). Further improvements are needed in this area to support precise, effective collaboration.…”
Section: Area 2 Graphical Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lasers are used to represent objects and scenes using 3D graphical illustration (e.g., Livatino et al, 2010;Sickel et al, 2011) andrendering (e.g., Chuen Leong et al, 2010;Morioka et al, 2012). Further improvements are needed in this area to support precise, effective collaboration.…”
Section: Area 2 Graphical Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when adopting and integrating laser technology, the following limitations should be taken in account: the nature of laser requires direct line of site along the laser beam; laser signal is influenced by disturbances and vibrations applied on the transmitting and receiving units, the media the laser beam pass through and the objects under investigations; in scenarios that laser is used as a tool (in manufacturing or medical domains), it require high power source and there is no tactile sensitivity or contact feedback; in mapping, spatial sensing, communication and collaboration tasks, due to the enormous amount of data collected at high rates, laser technology requires high computation power to cope with the amount of data and algorithms. (Sickel et al, 2011); collaborative processing (Chuen Leong et al, 2010) j j j…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 ear dimensions were selected through a review of literatures and the decision by experts. 22 ear dimensions (length: 8; width: 7; depth: 1; angle: 2; ratio: 3; thickness: 1) were identified from 22 papers (Ahmed and Omer 2015;Alexander and Laubach 1968;Algazi et al 2001;Barut and Aktunc 2006;Bozkir et al 2006;Buckley et al 2005;Dellepiane et al 2008;Hammond et al 2004;Herskovits 1930;Jung 2000;Jung and Jung 2003;Jung et al 2014;Kalcioglu et al 2003;Kaushal and Kaushal 2011;Liu 2008;Meijerman, van der Lugt, and Maat 2007;Mohamed et al 2013;Nathan et al 2008;Paulsen 2004;Porter and Olson 2001;Sickel et al 2011;Taura, Adamu, and Modibbo 2013;Yoon and Jung 2002). 6 dimensions (length: 3; width: 2; depth: 1) were selected in the present study (Figure 2).…”
Section: Ear Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third strategy is to design for individual fit. It is widely used for the design of hearing-aid equipment 23 and customized earphones. Customized earphones, such as UE custom in-ear monitors and QDC in-ear earphones, were conducted to fit the unique shape of ears to provide incredible comfort and noise cancellation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%