2010
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0b013e3181d1a75e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Earlier Detection of Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Abstract: A home device preferential hyperacuity perimeter has good sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between patients with newly diagnosed CNV and intermediate AMD. Sensitivity is not dependent on lesion characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the ForeseeHome device in distinguishing between newly diagnosed CNV and intermediate AMD in an unsupervised manner (at home) was on average 85%, thus comparable to PHP used in a clinical setting [61]. Moreover, the sensitivity of the ForeseeHome device is not influenced by type, size, or location of the CNV lesion [61]. …”
Section: Home Monitoring Testsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the ForeseeHome device in distinguishing between newly diagnosed CNV and intermediate AMD in an unsupervised manner (at home) was on average 85%, thus comparable to PHP used in a clinical setting [61]. Moreover, the sensitivity of the ForeseeHome device is not influenced by type, size, or location of the CNV lesion [61]. …”
Section: Home Monitoring Testsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data obtained from patients are compared to a normative database, and the system determines whether there are visual responses which may be associated with progression of AMD to CNV [60]. The sensitivity and specificity of the ForeseeHome device in distinguishing between newly diagnosed CNV and intermediate AMD in an unsupervised manner (at home) was on average 85%, thus comparable to PHP used in a clinical setting [61]. Moreover, the sensitivity of the ForeseeHome device is not influenced by type, size, or location of the CNV lesion [61].…”
Section: Home Monitoring Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This monitoring strategy was previously tested in an out-patient setting in a cross-sectional evaluation. 14 This monitoring, coupled with telemedicine is currently tested for home use prospectively.…”
Section: Home Monitoring Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the development of a home device, after several modifications to the original device, including reduction in its physical size; enclosure of the screen viewer in a closed hood in order to control distance from the display, ambient light conditions, and occlusion of the non-tested eye; and addition of infrared sensors to ensure correct positioning of the head [55]. This device was evaluated in a phase III, unmasked, randomized clinical trial: the HOME (Home Monitoring of the Eye) study [56].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%