2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward reducing no-clean flux spatter during reflow soldering: Investigating the effect of flux type, solder mask, and solder pad design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The substrate without the solder mask exhibited the highest surface roughness from evaluated variants of PCB. As the previous state [21,25], the higher surface roughness generally increases the wettability of the liquid. The flux spreading area was thus larger (Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Different Types Of Solder Maskmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The substrate without the solder mask exhibited the highest surface roughness from evaluated variants of PCB. As the previous state [21,25], the higher surface roughness generally increases the wettability of the liquid. The flux spreading area was thus larger (Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Different Types Of Solder Maskmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…During the traditional soldering process, organic flux is applied to metal surfaces to remove dirt and oxide, enhancing the soldering reliability. However, if the flux residues existed in the solder joint, it can cause severe corrosion and the weakening of the soldering strength [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. With the miniaturization of solder joints in three-dimensional integrated circuits, it has become more challenging to eliminate the flux, and its impact on the interconnection is becoming increasingly significant [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%