2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward the low-scatter selection of X-ray clusters

Abstract: Context. One key ingredient in using galaxy clusters as a precision cosmological probe in large X-ray surveys is understanding selection effects. The dependence of the X-ray emission on the square of the gas density leads to a predominant role of cool cores in the detection of galaxy clusters. The contribution of cool cores to the X-ray luminosity does not scale with cluster mass and cosmology and therefore affects the use of X-ray clusters in producing cosmological constraints. Aims. One of the main science g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More massive groups with luminosities ∼10 42 erg s −1 should be detectable to z ∼ 0.1 in the final eRASS:8 survey. Käfer et al [343] performed detailed simulations to evaluate the sensitivity of eRASS:8 to galaxy groups. The authors used a wavelet decomposition algorithm sensitive to large-scale diffuse emission.…”
Section: Impact On Cosmological Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More massive groups with luminosities ∼10 42 erg s −1 should be detectable to z ∼ 0.1 in the final eRASS:8 survey. Käfer et al [343] performed detailed simulations to evaluate the sensitivity of eRASS:8 to galaxy groups. The authors used a wavelet decomposition algorithm sensitive to large-scale diffuse emission.…”
Section: Impact On Cosmological Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expected sensitivity curve of the final eROSITA survey (eRASS:8) compared to the sensitivity of existing and upcoming X-ray and SZ surveys. The eROSITA sensitivity curve was computed from synthetic data using a wavelet decomposition algorithm[343] sensitive to scales of 1-4 (solid blue curve) and 1-16 (dashed blue curve). For comparison, the dashed black curve shows the sensitivity of the ROSAT all-sky survey assuming a fixed soft X-ray flux threshold of 1.8 × 10 −12 erg s −1 , which is the typical sensitivity of the REFLEX and NORAS samples (green asterisks,[345]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplicity functions of the two samples cross each other at 10 14.5 M h −1 , then the unrelaxed structures take over at the high-mass end. This approach offers a possible connection to selection effects in observations, such as the cool core bias in X-rays (Eckert et al 2011;Käfer et al 2019Käfer et al , 2020. It possibly offers a solution to mitigate biases in a cosmological interpretation of clusters abundance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, only the deepest existing X-ray survey, that is, the Chandra Deep Field-South (CDF-S) 7 Ms survey (Luo et al 2017), reaches 0.5-2 keV fluxes where the number of nonactive galaxies becomes non-negligible (i.e., f 0.5−2 10 −17 erg s −1 cm −2 ): in all the other X-ray surveys, AGNs make up almost the totality of the detected sources. Characterizing the properties of the diffuse medium in clusters of galaxies, which are the largest virialized structures in the Universe, also requires deep X-ray surveys over large areas of the sky (see, e.g., Finoguenov et al 2015;Käfer et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%