2020
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2019.2926822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Time-Optimal Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Ship Maneuvering in Close-Range Encounters

Abstract: Ship intelligence has been a hot topic in recent years. How to achieve autonomous maneuvers in a complex marine environment in a safe, efficient, and low-cost manner is a fundamental task that ocean engineers face. This paper presents a two-stage trajectory planning scheme to address the minimumtime maneuvering problem in close-range encounters. The scheme is robust and versatile, as it can deal with the complex spatial variability, such as sea current, state constraints, marine traffic, and physical constrain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained are in Table 2 and Figure 5. First, in Table 2, we represent both the error e following (18) and the proportion of trajectories in which the DGM provides a lower cost than the baseline, i.e., the improvement proportion of trajectories. Note that, in both metrics, the DGM provides considerably better results than the baseline: first, the error is always negative, which means that the DGM is better than the baseline, and then, the improvement proportion of DGM is of 87% for all disturbances tested.…”
Section: Original Problem Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained are in Table 2 and Figure 5. First, in Table 2, we represent both the error e following (18) and the proportion of trajectories in which the DGM provides a lower cost than the baseline, i.e., the improvement proportion of trajectories. Note that, in both metrics, the DGM provides considerably better results than the baseline: first, the error is always negative, which means that the DGM is better than the baseline, and then, the improvement proportion of DGM is of 87% for all disturbances tested.…”
Section: Original Problem Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they use coverage path planning, which consists of solving the optimal control problem in a discrete environment, and then check whether the discrete solution can be applied to a continuous system. A similar procedure is described in [ 18 ], where the authors first find a discrete solution and then interpolate it. In contrast to these works, which rely on discretization of the states, we solve the problem in the continuous domain, and also use a different target function, as we intend to minimize the time to reach a certain target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been work done in detecting when collisions will happen between two ships for the purposes of autonomous ship routing [21], [16].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ships have the potential to reduce human-based errors, lower fuel consumption, and extend the operational window [2]. Efforts have been made in the recent years to develop modern control [3] and path planning algorithm [4] for marine vehicles. Nonetheless, these autonomous systems must be able to process the current environmental conditions for safe and effective decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%