2018
DOI: 10.1002/srin.201700532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Unraveling the High Temperature Microstructure Processing Properties Relationship in a Ni‐Free High Nitrogen Bearing Duplex Stainless Steel

Abstract: The present study deals with thermomechanical processing behavior of a Nifree high nitrogen bearing duplex stainless steel. This is performed through compressing the material over a wide range of temperature (700-1000 C) under the strain rates of 0.001-0.1 s À1 . The microstructural observations show that continuous and discontinuous dynamic recrystallization are taken place simultaneously in austenite at 900 and 1000 C by generating subgrains and bulging along the prior austenite grain boundaries, respectivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The misorientation angle/axes of the annealing twins are deviated from ideal coincidence (60°<111>). This was precisely assessed by Abedi et al and Khatami‐Hamedani et al during hot tensile tests of low density steel and hot compression tests of high nitrogen duplex stainless steel at various strain rates during, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The misorientation angle/axes of the annealing twins are deviated from ideal coincidence (60°<111>). This was precisely assessed by Abedi et al and Khatami‐Hamedani et al during hot tensile tests of low density steel and hot compression tests of high nitrogen duplex stainless steel at various strain rates during, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36]. The material would experience high amount of strain, strain rate and temperature, and the occurrence of any microstructure evolution (substructure development, grain refinement, phase transformation and second phase redistribution) or texture evolution, are highly probable [37][38][39][40][41]. In this respect, the current work also try to clarify the imperative role of microstructure and texture in improvement of the corrosion resistance, biocompatibility and invitro degradation behavior of the processed Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr alloy nano-biocomposite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the different phase component and grain size in DSS and ASS, there are significant differences in microstructure evolution and thermomechanical processing behavior between the two alloys. [ 27,34–36 ] As shown in Figure 1 , [ 37 ] the yield strength (YS) of 2205 DSS at room temperature is twice that of 304 ASS, whereas their high temperature strength is very close. These differences between 2205 DSS and 304 ASS increased the difficulty of parameter selection in their DFSW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%