2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.92.123535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a cosmological neutrino mass detection

Abstract: Future cosmological measurements should enable the sum of neutrino masses to be determined indirectly through their effects on the expansion rate of the Universe and the clustering of matter. We consider prospects for the gravitationally lensed cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs) in the galaxy distribution, examining how the projected uncertainty of ≈15 meV on the neutrino mass sum (a 4σ detection of the minimal mass) might be reached over the next decade. The… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
246
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
17
246
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change leaves a characteristic imprint on several cosmological observables (see, e.g. [16,[63][64][65][66][67]), letting cosmology to strongly bound the neutrino mass scale, indeed providing the current strongest (albeit model dependent) bounds on Σ. Bounds on Σ from recent cosmological data have been presented in several papers (see, for example, [68][69][70][71][72][73] and references therein) while forecasts for near (and far) future cosmological datasets have been obtained in [74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change leaves a characteristic imprint on several cosmological observables (see, e.g. [16,[63][64][65][66][67]), letting cosmology to strongly bound the neutrino mass scale, indeed providing the current strongest (albeit model dependent) bounds on Σ. Bounds on Σ from recent cosmological data have been presented in several papers (see, for example, [68][69][70][71][72][73] and references therein) while forecasts for near (and far) future cosmological datasets have been obtained in [74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, gravitational lensing converts some of the E-mode polarization into B-mode polarization (Zaldarriaga & Seljak 1998). Measurements of temperature and polarization with sufficient resolution and sensitivity can be used to reconstruct the intervening matter distribution, and,in the future, such bias-free measurements of large-scale structures will become some of the most powerful probes in cosmology (e.g., Hu 2002;Namikawa et al 2010;Wu et al 2014;Abazajian et al 2015;Allison et al 2015;Pan & Knox 2015). Lensing can also act as a noise source for primordial B modes, which peak at degreescales (e.g., Kesden et al 2002;Knox & Song 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 3 is integral along the line-of-sight, dl. For a given spherical pressure profile, P e (r) = n e (r)kT e (r) the y signal for a cluster projected on the sky is, We emphasize that this is a straw-person experimental design for CMB Stage-4, for example the frequency bands for CMB Stage- 4 have not yet been determined. These particular bands were chosen to cover the main atmospheric windows around the peak CMB and tSZ sensitivity with extra high and low frequency bands for potential foreground cleaning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not critical for the science targets, we show how much the addition of DESI can improve our constraints. The Fisher formalism for CMB and BAO and the experimental configurations for Planck and DESI follow those used in [4].…”
Section: Parameter Fiducial Step Prior ωChmentioning
confidence: 99%