Towards a Framework for Agent-Enabled Semantic Web Service Composition

Ermolayev, Vadim; Keberle, Natalya; Plaksin, Sergey; Kononenko, Oleksandr; Terziyan, Vagan

doi:10.4018/jwsr.2004070104

Cited by 64 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The DEDP modeling framework in its part of process modeling bases its approach on [15][16][17]. The advancements of PSI approach are: (i) a rich typology of actions; (ii) environmentalistic approach to model processes, actions, their dependencies comprising concurrency; (iii) a state model refined using decision making mechanism and requirement sensitivity; (iv) an explicit difference between events and actions.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling Actions in Dynamic Engineering Design Processes

Ermolayev¹,

Keberle²,

Jentzsch

et al. 2009

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The paper presents the approach for modeling actions in the dynamic processes of engineering design in Microelectronics and Integrated Circuits domain. It elaborates the formal framework for representing processes, the states of these processes and process environments, the actions being the constituents of the processes. Presented framework is implemented as the part of PSI Suite of Ontologies and is evaluated using three different methods: user evaluation, formal evaluation, and commonsense evaluation following PSI shaker modeling methodology. The Suite of PSI ontologies is used for representing Dynamic Engineering Design Processes in Cadence Project Planning Expert System software prototype.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling Actions in Dynamic Engineering Design Processes

Ermolayev¹,

Keberle²,

Jentzsch

et al. 2009

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The mechanism of incorporating new actors to the process and the model of the design team are subjectively dynamic as well since they depend on the decisions and choices taken at run time by the actors which states change in the process. The rules of encounter of the mentioned mechanism are shared static and provide the horizontal laws for the system [Er04,EJM04]. A design artifact is a subjectively dynamic outcome of the process since it is formed out by subjectively dynamic collaborative team of actors.…”

Section: The Model Of a Dynamic Engineering Design Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…− The composition [Er04] of the activities is defined only subjectively and partially. Tasks in our model may be composed of the activities and other tasks in different ways by different actors having different knowledge.…”

Section: The Model Of a Dynamic Engineering Design Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling Dynamic Engineering Design Processes in PSI

Ermolayev¹,

Jentzsch

Karsayev

et al. 2005

Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. One way to make engineering design effective and efficient is to make its processes flexible -i.e. self-adjusting, self-configuring, and selfoptimizing at run time. The paper presents the descriptive part of the Dynamic Engineering Design Process (DEDP) modeling framework developed in PSI 1 project. The project aims to build a software tool assisting managers to analyze and enhance the productivity of the DEDPs through process simulations. The framework incorporates the models of teams and actors, tasks and activities, design artifacts as the major interrelated parts. DEDPs are modeled as weakly defined flows of tasks and atomic activities which may only "become apparent" at run time because of several presented dynamic factors. The processes are self-formed through the mechanisms of collaboration in the dynamic team of actors. These mechanisms are based on several types of contracting negotiations. DEDP productivity is assessed by the Units of Welfare collected by the multi-agent system which models the design team. The models of the framework are formalized in the family of DEDP ontologies.

show abstract

“…Non-symmetric negotiations are more common in practice because their settings reflect real life more adequately. Indeed, even in information retrieval a) an agent within a centralized mediator (e.g., [EKK04]) has different roles in its negotiations with IR providing agents, b) the roles of different parties are also different -a user, a mediator, an IR provider, c) the abilities of different parties to influence the process of negotiation differ as well -a mediator agent should be more conservative in its concessions on the meaning of concepts (Section 8). Of course, the mechanisms for non-symmetric encounters, though more realistic, are more difficult to implement and subsume symmetric ones as singular cases.…”

Section: Interactions and Negotiationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Strategy for Automated Meaning Negotiation in Distributed Information Retrieval

Ermolayev

Keberle

Matzke

et al. 2005

The Semantic Web – ISWC 2005

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The paper reports on the formal framework to design strategies for multi-issue non-symmetric meaning negotiations among software agents in a distributed information retrieval system. The advancements of the framework are the following. A resulting strategy compares the contexts of two background domain theories not concept by concept, but the whole context (conceptual graph) to the other context by accounting the relationships among concepts, the properties and the constraints over properties. It contains the mechanisms for measuring contextual similarity through assessing propositional substitutions and to provide argumentation through generating extra contexts. It uses presuppositions for choosing the best similarity hypotheses and to make the mutual concession to common sense monotonic. It provides the means to evaluate the possible eagerness to concede through semantic commitments and related notions of knowledgeability and degree of reputation

show abstract

Towards a Framework for Agent-Enabled Semantic Web Service Composition

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Cited by 64 publications

References 16 publications

Modeling Actions in Dynamic Engineering Design Processes

Modeling Actions in Dynamic Engineering Design Processes

Modeling Dynamic Engineering Design Processes in PSI

A Strategy for Automated Meaning Negotiation in Distributed Information Retrieval

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About