2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a health-conscious transportation planning: A framework for estimating health impacts of active transportation at local level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transportation decision making is driven in large part by considerations of monetary costs and benefits. Monetizing the health impacts of changes to the built environment designed to support AT could help speed up implementation of AT interventions by demonstrating the costs and benefits of investment in AT and placing them on a common scale [46][47][48]. However, because different entities are responsible for transportation versus health care costs and benefits flow to different populations and organizations, such monetization might not stimulate more rapid investment in AT.…”
Section: The Chat Program and Research Gaps In Active Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transportation decision making is driven in large part by considerations of monetary costs and benefits. Monetizing the health impacts of changes to the built environment designed to support AT could help speed up implementation of AT interventions by demonstrating the costs and benefits of investment in AT and placing them on a common scale [46][47][48]. However, because different entities are responsible for transportation versus health care costs and benefits flow to different populations and organizations, such monetization might not stimulate more rapid investment in AT.…”
Section: The Chat Program and Research Gaps In Active Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few cases, such models suggest substantial benefits overall for investments in AT infrastructure that are not always captured in simpler models [55]. For example, a recent analysis of Prince Georges County, Maryland in the United States illustrates the use of the Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modeling (ITHIM) framework and a cost of illness/VSL approach and suggests significant health and monetary benefits of increasing active travel and reduced automobile use [48]. Both increased walking and increased biking resulted in benefits.…”
Section: The Chat Program and Research Gaps In Active Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PI as a context-dependent and cross-disciplinary behavioral health has been associated with socioeconomic and built-environment factors (Aljabri 2022 ; Prince et al 2022 ; Rütte et al 2013 ). In terms of the built environment, urban characteristics such as urban form (e.g., residential density and high connectivity street network), neighborhood safety, and green space (Xiao et al 2022 ; Peng et al 2021 ; Passi-Solar et al 2020 ; Feng and Astell-Burt 2019 ; Andersen et al 2018 ) have received increased attention due to their associations with PI, obesity, and cardiovascular disease (Adlakha et al 2021 ; Sims et al 2020 ; An et al 2019 ; Lenhart et al 2017 ; Xu et al 2015 ; Unger et al 2014 ). Evidence suggests that the built environment can positively or adversely influence health behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reduces a household's ability to pay for health-promoting necessities such as nutritious food, healthcare visits, energy, and home maintenance [14][15][16]. Additionally, urban amenities such as parks, bike lanes, and playgrounds encourage an active lifestyle and reduce the incidence of obesity [17][18][19][20][21]. While green spaces are important in reducing obesity concerns [22], there are inconsistent results concerning the association between green spaces and obesity [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%